Literature DB >> 17503434

Chemicals causing mammary gland tumors in animals signal new directions for epidemiology, chemicals testing, and risk assessment for breast cancer prevention.

Ruthann A Rudel1, Kathleen R Attfield, Jessica N Schifano, Julia Green Brody.   

Abstract

Identifying chemical carcinogens in animal studies is currently the primary means of anticipating cancer effects in humans. Animal studies to evaluate potential chemical carcinogenicity are particularly important for breast cancer because environmental and occupational epidemiologic research is sparse. Chemicals that increased mammary gland tumors in animal studies were compiled from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), and other sources. Summary assessments of the carcinogenic potential for each chemical and potentially exposed populations were also compiled. In all, 216 chemicals were identified that have been associated with increases in mammary gland tumors in at least 1 study. These include industrial chemicals, chlorinated solvents, products of combustion, pesticides, dyes, radiation, drinking water disinfection byproducts, pharmaceuticals and hormones, natural products, and research chemicals. Twenty-nine are produced in the U.S. at >1 million pounds/year; 35 are air pollutants, 25 have involved occupational exposures to >5000 women, and 73 have been present in consumer products or as contaminants of food. Thus, exposure is widespread. Nearly all of the chemicals were mutagenic and most caused tumors in multiple organs and species; these characteristics are generally believed to indicate likely carcinogenicity in humans. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive list developed of animal mammary gland carcinogens and, along with associated data, is publicly available at URL: www.silentspring.org/sciencereview and at URL: www.komen.org/environment. Valuable information from cancer bioassays is not well utilized in risk assessment and regulatory processes, suggesting a need to strengthen chemicals testing and risk assessment as tools for breast cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503434     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  58 in total

1.  Intervention of human breast cell carcinogenesis chronically induced by 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine.

Authors:  Shambhunath Choudhary; Shilpa Sood; Robert L Donnell; Hwa-Chain R Wang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Airborne mammary carcinogens and breast cancer risk in the Sister Study.

Authors:  Nicole M Niehoff; Marilie D Gammon; Alexander P Keil; Hazel B Nichols; Lawrence S Engel; Dale P Sandler; Alexandra J White
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Breast cancer and the environment: why research and preventive action are needed.

Authors:  James T Brophy; Margaret M Keith; Robert Park; Andrew Watterson; Michael Gilbertson; Robert Dematteo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Linking exposure assessment science with policy objectives for environmental justice and breast cancer advocacy: the northern California household exposure study.

Authors:  Julia Green Brody; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Ami Zota; Phil Brown; Carla Pérez; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Chemical exposures in the workplace and breast cancer risk: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Christine G Parks; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Female temperament, tumor development and life span: relation to glucocorticoid and tumor necrosis factor alpha levels in rats.

Authors:  Sonia A Cavigelli; Jeanette M Bennett; Kerry C Michael; Laura Cousino Klein
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  Contrasting epistatic interactions between rat quantitative trait loci controlling mammary cancer development.

Authors:  Géraldine Piessevaux; Virginie Lella; Michèle Rivière; Daniel Stieber; Pierre Drèze; Josiane Szpirer; Claude Szpirer
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Self-reported chemicals exposure, beliefs about disease causation, and risk of breast cancer in the Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Ann Aschengrau; Ruthann A Rudel; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Research recommendations for selected IARC-classified agents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Indoor air pollution: an old problem with new challenges.

Authors:  John Spengler; Gary Adamkiewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.