Literature DB >> 19052818

Contrasting epistatic interactions between rat quantitative trait loci controlling mammary cancer development.

Géraldine Piessevaux1, Virginie Lella, Michèle Rivière, Daniel Stieber, Pierre Drèze, Josiane Szpirer, Claude Szpirer.   

Abstract

We previously defined quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that control susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz(alpha)anthracene-induced mammary carcinoma in SPRD-Cu3 (susceptible) and WKY (resistant) rats. Two of these QTLs, assigned to chromosomes (Chr) 10 and 18, control tumor growth rate and invasiveness. In this study we characterized a congenic strain in which a large segment of WKY Chr 10 was introduced in the SPRD-Cu3 genetic background and demonstrated that this chromosome segment controls this tumor trait. The WKY allele at this QTL (Mcsta1) reduces the growth rate of the fastest growing tumors by 26%. We also previously showed that two SPRD-Cu3-WKY congenic strains containing a WKY chromosome segment derived either from Chr 5 or from Chr 18 exhibit a reduction in tumor multiplicity (QTLs Msctm1 and Mcstm2, respectively) (with no reduction in tumor growth rate in the Chr 18 congenic). In this study we generated a double congenic strain, which contains the two WKY differential segments from Chr 5 and 18, to determine how these two segments interact with one another. Interestingly, two types of epistatic interactions were found: no additive effect was seen with respect to tumor multiplicity, while a reduction in tumor growth rate was observed. It thus appears that WKY alleles located on Chr 5 and Chr 8 interact epistatically in a contrasting manner to modulate tumor multiplicity (in a nonadditive manner) and growth rate (in a synergic manner). Tumor growth rate is thus influenced by two QTLs, on Chr 10 (Mcsta1) and on Chr 18 (Mcsta2), the action of the latter being dependent on the presence of the Chr5 QTL (Mcstm1). The expression level of positional and functional candidate genes was also analyzed. On Chr 5, Pla2g2a is subject to a syntenic control while expression of the Tp53 (Chr 10) and Pmai1/Noxa (Chr 18) genes appears to be controlled by several mammary cancer resistance QTLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052818     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-008-9155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  33 in total

1.  Noxa, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family and candidate mediator of p53-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  E Oda; R Ohki; H Murasawa; J Nemoto; T Shibue; T Yamashita; T Tokino; T Taniguchi; N Tanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; B A Gusterson; A E Rogers; I H Russo; S R Wellings; M J van Zwieten
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.662

3.  DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  A Di Leonardo; S P Linke; K Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  The genetic components of susceptibility to breast cancer in the rat.

Authors:  L A Shepel; M N Gould
Journal:  Prog Exp Tumor Res       Date:  1999

5.  Isolation of two regions on rat chromosomes 5 and 18 affecting mammary cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Daniel Stieber; Géraldine Piessevaux; Michèle Rivière; Jean-François Laes; Xiaojiang Quan; Josiane Szpirer; Claude Szpirer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Mammary cancer resistance and precocious mammary differentiation in the WKY rat: identification of 2 quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Virginie Lella; Daniel Stieber; Michèle Rivière; Josiane Szpirer; Claude Szpirer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Mammary cancer susceptibility: human genes and rodent models.

Authors:  Claude Szpirer; Josiane Szpirer
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Comparison of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene metabolism and DNA binding in mammary epithelial cells from three rat strains with differing susceptibilities to mammary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  C J Moore; W A Tricomi; M N Gould
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  Environmental pollutants, diet, physical activity, body size, and breast cancer: where do we stand in research to identify opportunities for prevention?

Authors:  Julia Green Brody; Ruthann A Rudel; Karin B Michels; Kirsten B Moysich; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen R Attfield; Sharon Gray
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.514

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Induced mammary cancer in rat models: pathogenesis, genetics, and relevance to female breast cancer.

Authors:  James L Miller; Arianna P Bartlett; Rebecca M Harman; Prabin Dhangada Majhi; D Joseph Jerry; Gerlinde R Van de Walle
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  BAC CGH-array identified specific small-scale genomic imbalances in diploid DMBA-induced rat mammary tumors.

Authors:  Emma Samuelson; Sara Karlsson; Karolina Partheen; Staffan Nilsson; Claude Szpirer; Afrouz Behboudi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Epistatic Control of Mammary Cancer Susceptibility in Mice may Depend on the Dietary Environment.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Ryan R Gordon; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Hereditary Genet       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  Significant overlap between human genome-wide association-study nominated breast cancer risk alleles and rat mammary cancer susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Jennifer Sanders; David J Samuelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  SOCS proteins in infectious diseases of mammals.

Authors:  Mario Delgado-Ortega; Daniel Marc; Joëlle Dupont; Sascha Trapp; Mustapha Berri; François Meurens
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.046

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.