Literature DB >> 17503053

Neurophysiological response selectivity for conspecific songs over synthetic sounds in the auditory forebrain of non-singing female songbirds.

Mark E Hauber1, Phillip Cassey, Sarah M N Woolley, Frederic E Theunissen.   

Abstract

Female choice plays a critical role in the evolution of male acoustic displays. Yet there is limited information on the neurophysiological basis of female songbirds' auditory recognition systems. To understand the neural mechanisms of how non-singing female songbirds perceive behaviorally relevant vocalizations, we recorded responses of single neurons to acoustic stimuli in two auditory forebrain regions, the caudal lateral mesopallium (CLM) and Field L, in anesthetized adult female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Using various metrics of response selectivity, we found consistently higher response strengths for unfamiliar conspecific songs compared to tone pips and white noise in Field L but not in CLM. We also found that neurons in the left auditory forebrain had lower response strengths to synthetics sounds, leading to overall higher neural selectivity for song in neurons of the left hemisphere. This laterality effect is consistent with previously published behavioral data in zebra finches. Overall, our results from Field L are in parallel and from CLM are in contrast with the patterns of response selectivity reported for conspecific songs over synthetic sounds in male zebra finches, suggesting some degree of sexual dimorphism of auditory perception mechanisms in songbirds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503053     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0231-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   2.389


  55 in total

Review 1.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird.

Authors:  D L Maney; E A MacDougall-Shackleton; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; G F Ball; T P Hahn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Experience-dependent neuronal specialization and functional organization in the central auditory area of a songbird.

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Jean-Pierre Richard; Maryvonne Mathelier; Laurence Henry; Isabelle George; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Song selectivity in the song system and in the auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Noopur Amin; Sarita S Shaevitz; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane Fremouw; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Eliot A Brenowitz; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  State-dependent hemispheric specialization in the songbird brain.

Authors:  Isabelle George; Hugo Cousillas; Jean-Pierre Richard; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus.

Authors:  E A Brenowitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei.

Authors:  Anton Reiner; David J Perkel; Laura L Bruce; Ann B Butler; András Csillag; Wayne Kuenzel; Loreta Medina; George Paxinos; Toru Shimizu; Georg Striedter; Martin Wild; Gregory F Ball; Sarah Durand; Onur Güntürkün; Diane W Lee; Claudio V Mello; Alice Powers; Stephanie A White; Gerald Hough; Lubica Kubikova; Tom V Smulders; Kazuhiro Wada; Jennifer Dugas-Ford; Scott Husband; Keiko Yamamoto; Jing Yu; Connie Siang; Erich D Jarvis; Onur Gütürkün
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-05-31       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Social experience influences the development of a central auditory area.

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Isabelle George; Maryvonne Mathelier; Jean-Pierre Richard; Laurence Henry; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-25
View more
  20 in total

1.  Humans mimicking animals: a cortical hierarchy for human vocal communication sounds.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Kristina M Rapuano; Laura A Hitt; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Kamal Sen; Edwin W Rubel; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Brain expression and song regulation of the cholecystokinin gene in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Peter V Lovell; Claudio V Mello
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Experience-dependent overrepresentation of ultrasonic vocalization frequencies in the rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Heesoo Kim; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Estradiol selectively enhances auditory function in avian forebrain neurons.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Matthew O'Brien; Eliot A Brenowitz; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.

Authors:  Mukta Chakraborty; Lisa A Mangiamele; Sabrina S Burmeister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The development of stimulus-specific auditory responses requires song exposure in male but not female zebra finches.

Authors:  Kristen K Maul; Henning U Voss; Lucas C Parra; Delanthi Salgado-Commissariat; Douglas Ballon; Ofer Tchernichovski; Santosh A Helekar
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.964

10.  Experience dependence of neural responses to different classes of male songs in the primary auditory forebrain of female songbirds.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Sarah M N Woolley; Phillip Cassey; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.