Literature DB >> 17503012

Data resolution: a jackknife procedure for determining the consistency of molecular marker datasets.

Th J L van Hintum1.   

Abstract

The results of genetic diversity studies using molecular markers not only depend on the biology of the studied objects but also on the quality of the marker data. Poor data quality may hamper the correct answering of biological questions. A new statistic is proposed to estimate the quality of a marker data set with regard to its ability to describe the structure of the biological material under study. This statistic is called data resolution (DR). It is calculated by splitting a marker data set at random into two sets each with half the number of markers. In each set, similarities between all pairs of objects are calculated. Subsequently, the similarities obtained for the two sets are correlated. This process is repeated a large number of times. The average of the correlation coefficients obtained in this way is the DR of the dataset. In the present paper, the DR statistic is applied to four studies involving amplified fragment length polymorphism as well as micro-satellite markers. In addition, some properties and possible applications of DR are discussed, including the prediction of the added value of scoring additional markers, and the determination of which similarity measure is, apart from genetical considerations, most appropriate for analyzing the data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503012     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-007-0566-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  10 in total

1.  Some thoughts on bacterial classification.

Authors:  P H SNEATH
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1957-08

2.  Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley.

Authors:  Peter Wenzl; Jason Carling; David Kudrna; Damian Jaccoud; Eric Huttner; Andris Kleinhofs; Andrzej Kilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.

Authors:  Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  M Nei; W H Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An estimation of the minimum number of SSR alleles needed to reveal genetic relationships in wheat varieties. I. Information from large-scale planted varieties and cornerstone breeding parents in Chinese wheat improvement and production.

Authors:  X Y Zhang; C W Li; L F Wang; H M Wang; G X You; Y S Dong
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-08-06       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics.

Authors:  M Morgante; A M Olivieri
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Significance tests and weighted values for AFLP similarities, based on Arabidopsis in silico AFLP fragment length distributions.

Authors:  Wim J M Koopman; Gerrit Gort
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The distribution of genetic diversity in a Brassica oleracea gene bank collection related to the effects on diversity of regeneration, as measured with AFLPs.

Authors:  Th J L van Hintum; C C M van de Wiel; D L Visser; R van Treuren; B Vosman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  High-throughput SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Suzanne Jenkins; Neil Gibson
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2002
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effects of ascertainment bias and marker number on estimations of barley diversity from high-throughput SNP genotype data.

Authors:  M Moragues; J Comadran; R Waugh; I Milne; A J Flavell; Joanne R Russell
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genetic structure, linkage disequilibrium and signature of selection in Sorghum: lessons from physically anchored DArT markers.

Authors:  Sophie Bouchet; David Pot; Monique Deu; Jean-François Rami; Claire Billot; Xavier Perrier; Ronan Rivallan; Laëtitia Gardes; Ling Xia; Peter Wenzl; Andrzej Kilian; Jean-Christophe Glaszmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of anonymous and targeted molecular markers for the estimation of genetic diversity in ex situ conserved Lactuca.

Authors:  R van Treuren; Th J L van Hintum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Development of genomic SSR markers for fingerprinting lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars and mapping genes.

Authors:  Gilda Rauscher; Ivan Simko
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.215

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.