BACKGROUND:Physical activity interventions tailored to individual characteristics and delivered via print produce greater increases in activity compared with nontailored interventions and controls. Using the Internet to deliver a tailored physical activity intervention offers an alternative to print that might be available to larger populations at a lower cost. METHODS:Participants (N=249 adults; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [9.3] years; and mean [SD] body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 29.4 [6.1]) were randomized to 1 of 3 physical activity interventions: (1) motivationally tailored Internet (tailored Internet, n=81), (2) motivationally tailored print (tailored print, n=86); and (3) 6 researcher-selected Web sites available to the public (standard Internet, n=82). Participants in the tailored Internet and tailored print arms received the same tailored intervention content. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants in the tailored print arm reported a median of 112.5 minutes of physical activity per week, those in the tailored Internet arm reported 120.0 minutes, and those in the standard Internet arm reported 90.0 minutes (P=.15). At 12 months, the physical activity minutes per week were 90.0, 90.0, and 80.0 for those in the tailored print, tailored Internet, and standard Internet arms, respectively (P=.74). Results indicated no significant differences between the 3 arms. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tailored Internet, tailored print, and standard Internet as part of a behavior change program increased physical activity behavior similarly. Because the use of the Internet was not different from the print-based intervention, this may be an opportunity to reach more sedentary adults in a more cost-effective way. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00200317.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Physical activity interventions tailored to individual characteristics and delivered via print produce greater increases in activity compared with nontailored interventions and controls. Using the Internet to deliver a tailored physical activity intervention offers an alternative to print that might be available to larger populations at a lower cost. METHODS:Participants (N=249 adults; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [9.3] years; and mean [SD] body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 29.4 [6.1]) were randomized to 1 of 3 physical activity interventions: (1) motivationally tailored Internet (tailored Internet, n=81), (2) motivationally tailored print (tailored print, n=86); and (3) 6 researcher-selected Web sites available to the public (standard Internet, n=82). Participants in the tailored Internet and tailored print arms received the same tailored intervention content. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants in the tailored print arm reported a median of 112.5 minutes of physical activity per week, those in the tailored Internet arm reported 120.0 minutes, and those in the standard Internet arm reported 90.0 minutes (P=.15). At 12 months, the physical activity minutes per week were 90.0, 90.0, and 80.0 for those in the tailored print, tailored Internet, and standard Internet arms, respectively (P=.74). Results indicated no significant differences between the 3 arms. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tailored Internet, tailored print, and standard Internet as part of a behavior change program increased physical activity behavior similarly. Because the use of the Internet was not different from the print-based intervention, this may be an opportunity to reach more sedentary adults in a more cost-effective way. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00200317.
Authors: Melissa A Napolitano; Kelley E Borradaile; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Jaime L Longval; Alfred F Parisi; Anna E Albrecht; Christopher N Sciamanna; John M Jakicic; George D Papandonatos; Bess H Marcus Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Dorothy W Pekmezi; David M Williams; Shira Dunsiger; Ernestine G Jennings; Beth A Lewis; John M Jakicic; Bess H Marcus Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: David M Williams; Charles E Matthews; Candace Rutt; Melissa A Napolitano; Bess H Marcus Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Rodney P Joseph; Dori Pekmezi; Gareth R Dutton; Andrea L Cherrington; Young-Il Kim; Jeroan J Allison; Nefertiti H Durant Journal: J Transcult Nurs Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 1.959
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Jenifer E Allsworth; Bess H Marcus; Jana Hesser; Kate L Lapane Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lisa Chasan-Taber; Bess H Marcus; Edward Stanek; Joseph T Ciccolo; David X Marquez; Caren G Solomon; Glenn Markenson Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.681