Literature DB >> 17502416

Role for cell density in antifungal drug resistance in Candida albicans biofilms.

Palani Perumal1, Satish Mekala, W LaJean Chaffin.   

Abstract

Biofilms of Candida albicans are less susceptible to many antifungal drugs than are planktonic yeast cells. We investigated the contribution of cell density to biofilm phenotypic resistance. Planktonic yeast cells in RPMI 1640 were susceptible to azole-class drugs, amphotericin B, and caspofungin at 1 x 10(3) cells/ml (standard conditions) using the XTT [2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide sodium salt] assay. As reported by others, as the cell concentration increased to 1 x 10(8) cells/ml, resistance was observed with 10- to 20-fold-greater MICs. Biofilms that formed in microtiter plate wells, like high-density planktonic organisms, were resistant to drugs. When biofilms were resuspended before testing, phenotypic resistance remained, but organisms, when diluted to 1 x 10(3) cells/ml, were susceptible. Drug-containing medium recovered from high-cell-density tests inhibited low-cell-density organisms. A fluconazole-resistant strain showed greater resistance at high planktonic cell density, in biofilm, and in resuspended biofilm than did low-density planktonic or biofilm organisms. A strain lacking drug efflux pumps CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1, while susceptible at a low azole concentration, was resistant at high cell density and in biofilm. A strain lacking CHK1 that fails to respond to the quorum-sensing molecule farnesol had the same response as did the wild type. FK506, reported to abrogate tolerance to azole drugs at low cell density, had no effect on tolerance at high cell density and in biofilm. These observations suggested that cell density has a role in the phenotypic resistance of biofilm, that neither the drug efflux pumps tested nor quorum sensing through Chk1p contributes to resistance, and that azole drug tolerance at high cell density differs mechanistically from tolerance at low cell density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17502416      PMCID: PMC1913227          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01237-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  63 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species.

Authors:  Frank C Odds; Mary Motyl; Roberto Andrade; Jacques Bille; Emilia Cantón; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Amanda Davidson; Christian Durussel; David Ellis; Elyse Foraker; Annette W Fothergill; Mahmoud A Ghannoum; Robert A Giacobbe; Miguel Gobernado; Rosemary Handke; Michel Laverdière; Wendy Lee-Yang; William G Merz; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Javier Pemán; Sophia Perea; John R Perfect; Michael A Pfaller; Laurie Proia; John H Rex; Michael G Rinaldi; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Wiley A Schell; Christine Shields; Deanna A Sutton; Paul E Verweij; David W Warnock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Candida albicans biofilms: more than filamentation.

Authors:  José L López-Ribot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Influence of incubation time, inoculum size, and glucose concentrations on spectrophotometric endpoint determinations for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole.

Authors:  M H Nguyen; C Y Yu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamic properties of three antifungal agents against preformed Candida albicans biofilms determined by time-kill studies.

Authors:  Gordon Ramage; Kacy VandeWalle; Stefano P Bachmann; Brian L Wickes; José L López-Ribot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A small subpopulation of blastospores in candida albicans biofilms exhibit resistance to amphotericin B associated with differential regulation of ergosterol and beta-1,6-glucan pathway genes.

Authors:  Prasanna D Khot; Peter A Suci; R Lance Miller; Raoul D Nelson; Bonnie J Tyler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol.

Authors:  J M Hornby; E C Jensen; A D Lisec; J J Tasto; B Jahnke; R Shoemaker; P Dussault; K W Nickerson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance.

Authors:  J Chandra; D M Kuhn; P K Mukherjee; L L Hoyer; T McCormick; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Candida biofilms.

Authors:  Carol A Kumamoto
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  Further standardization of broth microdilution methodology for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida species by use of an international collection of more than 3,000 clinical isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols.

Authors:  Pranab K Mukherjee; Jyotsna Chandra; Duncan M Kuhn; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  54 in total

1.  Effects of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin on Candida albicans biofilms under conditions of flow and on biofilm dispersion.

Authors:  Priya Uppuluri; Anand Srinivasan; Anand Ramasubramanian; Jose L Lopez-Ribot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Xenobiotic efflux in bacteria and fungi: a genomics update.

Authors:  Ravi D Barabote; Jose Thekkiniath; Richard E Strauss; Govindsamy Vediyappan; Joe A Fralick; Michael J San Francisco
Journal:  Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol       Date:  2011

3.  The role of Mss11 in Candida albicans biofilm formation.

Authors:  Pei-Wen Tsai; Yu-Ting Chen; Cheng-Yao Yang; Hsueh-Fen Chen; Te-Sheng Tan; Tzung-Wei Lin; Wen-Ping Hsieh; Chung-Yu Lan
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Comparative effect of propolis of honey bee and some herbal extracts on Candida albicans.

Authors:  Shahin Gavanji; Behrouz Larki
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  The effects of farnesol on Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and osteoblasts. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Lindsay Bonsignore; Mark E Shirtliff; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  From Biology to Drug Development: New Approaches to Combat the Threat of Fungal Biofilms.

Authors:  Christopher G Pierce; Anand Srinivasan; Anand K Ramasubramanian; José L López-Ribot
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-06

7.  Fungal Biofilms: In Vivo Models for Discovery of Anti-Biofilm Drugs.

Authors:  Jeniel E Nett; David R Andes
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-06

8.  Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Pranab K Mukherjee; Ali Abdul Lattif; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Eric Pearlman; Jonathan H Lass; Kerry O'Donnell; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Absence of amphotericin B-tolerant persister cells in biofilms of some Candida species.

Authors:  Rawya S Al-Dhaheri; L Julia Douglas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vitro evaluation of antibiotic lock technique for the treatment of Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis biofilms.

Authors:  Kwan Soo Ko; Ji-Young Lee; Jae-Hoon Song; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.