Literature DB >> 17500647

Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control.

Richard P Heitz1, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

A time-course analysis of visual attention focusing (attentional constraint) was conducted in groups of participants with high and low working memory spans, a dimension the authors have argued reflects the ability to control attention. In 4 experiments, participants performed the Eriksen flanker paradigm under increasing levels of speed stress. Conditional accuracy functions were derived to measure the time course of attentional constraint. The data showed that accuracy rates rose toward asymptote at different rates, with participants with high working memory spans reaching peak performance before participants with low working memory spans. The authors interpret these data in terms of a rate of attention constraint model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17500647     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  43 in total

1.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

3.  Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Robert W Weisberg; Naomi L Streeter; Shaleigh Kwok
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

4.  Conflicts as signals: bridging the gap between conflict detection and cognitive control.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Werner Sommer; Peter Frensch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11

5.  Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.

Authors:  Doris Keye; Oliver Wilhelm; Klaus Oberauer; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

Review 6.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 7.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Working memory capacity modulates task performance but has little influence on task choice.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Catherine M Arrington; Christina Weywadt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

9.  The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

10.  Working memory training improves visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Jayde Nail; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.