Literature DB >> 17500632

Interdependent sampling and social influence.

Jerker Denrell1, Gaël Le Mens.   

Abstract

Most explanations of social influence focus on why individuals might want to agree with the opinions or attitudes of others. The authors propose a different explanation that assumes the attitudes of others influence only the activities and objects individuals are exposed to. For example, individuals are likely to be exposed to activities that their friends enjoy. The authors demonstrate that such influence over sampling behavior is sufficient to produce a social influence effect when individuals form attitudes by learning from experience. Even if the experiences of 2 individuals, when they sample an object or event, are independent random variables, their attitudes will become positively correlated if their sampling processes are interdependent. Interdependent sampling of activities thus provides a different explanation of social influence with distinct empirical and theoretical implications. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17500632     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  7 in total

1.  Invisible Hands and Fine Calipers: A Call to Use Formal Theory as a Toolkit for Theory Construction.

Authors:  Donald J Robinaugh; Jonas M B Haslbeck; Oisín Ryan; Eiko I Fried; Lourens J Waldorp
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-02-16

2.  Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making.

Authors:  Wataru Toyokawa; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Socioeconomic status differences in psychological responses to unfair treatments: Behavioral evidence of a vicious cycle.

Authors:  Youngju Kim; Jaewuk Jung; Jinkyung Na
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.

Authors:  Anna Coenen; Jonathan D Nelson; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

5.  Cognitive Constraints on Decision Making under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Christian Lebiere; John R Anderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15

6.  Analysing the Unequal Effects of Positive and Negative Information on the Behaviour of Users of a Taiwanese On-Line Bulletin Board.

Authors:  Shu-Li Cheng; Wen-Hsien Lin; Frederick Kin Hing Phoa; Jing-Shiang Hwang; Wei-Chung Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Arbitrary Inequality in Reputation Systems.

Authors:  Vincenz Frey; Arnout van de Rijt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.