Literature DB >> 1750041

Selection process for surgeons in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

W S Moore1, C L Vescera, J T Robertson, W H Baker, V J Howard, J F Toole.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of asymptomatic hemodynamically significant stenosis. This report describes the selection process for participating surgeons in the trial.
METHODS: The Surgical Management Committee established guidelines for minimal annual experience and maximum neurological morbidity and mortality for surgeons to qualify to participate in the study. For approval, a surgeon must perform at least 12 carotid endarterectomies per year. Based on a review of the surgeon's last 50 consecutive endarterectomies, the combined neurological morbidity and mortality rate must be no greater than 5% for all indications and no greater than 3% for endarterectomies performed on asymptomatic patients.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four surgeons from 48 centers applied for approval: 117 were approved, 17 were rejected, and 30 were not reviewed. The 117 approved surgeons submitted a total of 5,641 endarterectomies with a combined mortality and neurological morbidity rate of 2.3% for the variety of indications for operation.
CONCLUSIONS: This overall experience with carotid endarterectomy is one of the largest series reported to date. The data from approved surgeons are well within the range of acceptable neurological morbidity and mortality rates recommended by the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association, which attests to the overall quality of the surgeons participating in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1750041     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.22.11.1353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  12 in total

1.  Ischemic Stroke Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert W Hobson; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D Hill; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; L Nelson Hopkins; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert D Ferguson; Stanley N Cohen; Joseph L Blackshear; Frank L Silver; J P Mohr; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Complication rates and center enrollment volume in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Nicole R Gonzales; Bart M Demaerschalk; Jenifer H Voeks; MeeLee Tom; George Howard; Alice J Sheffet; Lawrence Garcia; Daniel G Clair; John Barr; Steven Orlow; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Peri-interventional neurological complication rates in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting depend on the side of the stenosis treated.

Authors:  Kammler Juergen; Blessberger Hermann; Lichtenauer Michael; Lambert Thomas; Kellermair Joerg; Nahler Alexander; Schwarz Stefan; Reiter Christian; Grund Michael; Kypta Alexander; Steinwender Clemens
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.

Authors:  L Nelson Hopkins; Gary S Roubin; Elie Y Chakhtoura; William A Gray; Robert D Ferguson; Barry T Katzen; Kenneth Rosenfield; Jonathan Goldstein; Donald E Cutlip; William Morrish; Brajesh K Lal; Alice J Sheffet; MeeLee Tom; Susan Hughes; Jenifer Voeks; Krishna Kathir; James F Meschia; Robert W Hobson; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; James F Meschia; Ariane Mackey; William Brooks; Wesley S Moore; Michael D Hill; Vito A Mantese; Wayne M Clark; Carlos H Timaran; Donald Heck; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Seemant Chaturvedi; Brajesh K Lal; Jenifer H Voeks; Robert W Hobson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  A J Sheffet; G Roubin; G Howard; V Howard; W Moore; J F Meschia; R W Hobson; T G Brott
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.266

Review 8.  Carotid endarterectomy for prevention of stroke.

Authors:  W S Moore
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-07

9.  Carotid stenosis: endarterectomy or angioplasty and stenting?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Switzer; David C Hess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Critical decision analysis for extracranial cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  T J Takach; D A Ott; G J Reul; D A Cooley
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.