Literature DB >> 8680274

Critical decision analysis for extracranial cerebrovascular disease.

T J Takach1, D A Ott, G J Reul, D A Cooley.   

Abstract

Results from 6 major prospective studies that have recently been either completed, or terminated prematurely, provide compelling evidence of the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in treating certain groups of patients who have carotid stenosis. Results of these studies show that symptomatic patients (those experiencing transient ischemic attack, amaurosis, or completed mild stroke) with a 70% ipsilateral carotid stenosis have an absolute risk reduction of 39% to 65% for stroke or death when treated with carotid endarterectomy as opposed to medical therapy alone. Asymptomatic patients with a 60% ipsilateral carotid stenosis have 53% absolute risk reduction for stroke or death when treated with carotid endarterectomy, rather than medical therapy alone. Combined neurologic morbidity and perioperative mortality rates for treating carotid stenosis should not exceed 3% in the asymptomatic patient or 5% to 7% in the symptomatic patient, on the basis of criteria established by the American Heart Association. These studies show that prophylactic carotid endarterectomy can effectively reduce the risk of stroke in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Centers specializing in vascular surgery can benefit patients by minimizing the operative risk to levels well below those established by the American Heart Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8680274      PMCID: PMC325302     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  33 in total

Review 1.  Carotid endarterectomy: does it work?

Authors:  C Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Cardiac prognosis in noncardiac geriatric surgery.

Authors:  M C Gerson; J M Hurst; V S Hertzberg; P A Doogan; M B Cochran; S P Lim; N McCall; R J Adolph
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Time trends, cohort effects, and geographic patterns in stroke mortality--United States.

Authors:  M Feinleib; L Ingster; H Rosenberg; J Maurer; G Singh; K Kochanek
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Cardiovascular risk factor change--1973-74 to 1980-82: the Minnesota Heart Survey.

Authors:  R V Luepker; D R Jacobs; A R Folsom; R F Gillum; I D Frantz; O Gomez; H Blackburn
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  The decline of stroke.

Authors:  J P Whisnant
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W S Moore; H J Barnett; H G Beebe; E F Bernstein; B J Brener; T Brott; L R Caplan; A Day; J Goldstone; R W Hobson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Improved survival of stroke patients during the 1980s. The Minnesota Stroke Survey.

Authors:  E Shahar; P G McGovern; J M Sprafka; J S Pankow; K M Doliszny; R V Luepker; H Blackburn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Improvement in hypertension detection and control from 1973-1974 to 1980-1981. The Minnesota Heart Survey experience.

Authors:  A R Folsom; R V Luepker; R F Gillum; D R Jacobs; R J Prineas; H L Taylor; H Blackburn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Surgical procedures in patients aged 90 years and older.

Authors:  R B Adkins; H W Scott
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.