Literature DB >> 17498550

A phylogenetic approach to mapping cell fate.

Stephen J Salipante1, Marshall S Horwitz.   

Abstract

Recent, surprising, and controversial discoveries have challenged conventional concepts regarding the origins and plasticity of stem cells, and their contributions to tissue regeneration, and highlight just how little is known about mammalian development in comparison to simpler model organisms. In the case of the transparent worm, Caenorhabditis elegans, Sulston and colleagues used a microscope to record the birth and death of every cell during its life, and the compilation of this "fate map" represents a milestone achievement of developmental biology. Determining a fate map for mammals or other higher organisms is more complicated because they are opaque, take a long time to mature, and have a tremendous number of cells. Consequently, fate mapping experiments have relied on tagging a progenitor cell with a dye or genetic marker in order to later identify its descendants. This approach, however, extracts little information because it demonstrates that a population of cells, all having inherited the same label, shares a common ancestor, but it does not reveal how cells in that population are related to one another. To avoid that problem, as well as technical limitations of current methods for mapping cell fate, we, and others, have developed a new strategy for retrospectively deriving cell fate maps by using phylogenetics to infer the order in which somatic mutations have arisen in the genomes of individual cells during development in multicellular organisms. DNA replication inevitably introduces mutations, particularly at repetitive sequences, every time a cell divides. It is thus possible to deduce the history of cell divisions by cataloging somatic mutations and phylogenetically reconstructing cell lineage. This approach has the potential to produce a complete mammalian cell fate map that, in principle, could describe the developmental lineage of any cell and help resolve outstanding questions of stem cell biology, tissue repair and maintenance, and aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17498550     DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)79006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  17 in total

1.  Phylogenetic fate mapping: theoretical and experimental studies applied to the development of mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  Stephen J Salipante; James M Thompson; Marshall S Horwitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome sequencing of normal cells reveals developmental lineages and mutational processes.

Authors:  Meritxell Huch; Ruben van Boxtel; Wouter Karthaus; Sam Behjati; David C Wedge; Asif U Tamuri; Inigo Martincorena; Mia Petljak; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Gunes Gundem; Patrick S Tarpey; Sophie Roerink; Joyce Blokker; Mark Maddison; Laura Mudie; Ben Robinson; Serena Nik-Zainal; Peter Campbell; Nick Goldman; Marc van de Wetering; Edwin Cuppen; Hans Clevers; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stochasticity and stereotypy in the Ciona notochord.

Authors:  Maia Carlson; Wendy Reeves; Michael Veeman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 4.  Insect phylogenomics.

Authors:  S K Behura
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.585

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of developmental and postnatal mouse cell lineages.

Authors:  Stephen J Salipante; Arnold Kas; Eva McMonagle; Marshall S Horwitz
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  Next-generation sequencing in aging research: emerging applications, problems, pitfalls and possible solutions.

Authors:  João Pedro de Magalhães; Caleb E Finch; Georges Janssens
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 10.895

7.  Human DNA polymerase eta is required for common fragile site stability during unperturbed DNA replication.

Authors:  Laurie Rey; Julia M Sidorova; Nadine Puget; François Boudsocq; Denis S F Biard; Raymond J Monnat; Christophe Cazaux; Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Comparing algorithms that reconstruct cell lineage trees utilizing information on microsatellite mutations.

Authors:  Noa Chapal-Ilani; Yosef E Maruvka; Adam Spiro; Yitzhak Reizel; Rivka Adar; Liran I Shlush; Ehud Shapiro
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Muscle-bound primordial stem cells give rise to myofiber-associated myogenic and non-myogenic progenitors.

Authors:  Elad Segev; Gabi Shefer; Rivka Adar; Noa Chapal-Ilani; Shalev Itzkovitz; Inna Horovitz; Yitzhak Reizel; Dafna Benayahu; Ehud Shapiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of somatic mutations to quantify random contributions to mouse development.

Authors:  Wenyu Zhou; Yunbing Tan; Donovan J Anderson; Eva M Crist; Hannele Ruohola-Baker; Stephen J Salipante; Marshall S Horwitz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.