Literature DB >> 17498206

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction.

S Slawik1, R Soulsby, H Carter, H Payne, A R Dixon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Whilst trans-abdominal fixation +/- resection offers better functional results and lower recurrence than perineal procedures, mesh rectopexy is complicated by constipation. Laparoscopic autonomic nerve-sparing, ventral rectopexy allows correction of the underlying abnormalities of the rectum, vagina, bladder and pelvic floor.
METHOD: A prospective database was used to audit our 7-year experience of this technique. The recto-vaginal septum was mobilized anteriorly to the pelvic floor avoiding nerve damage. A prolene mesh was sutured to the ventral rectum, posterior vagina and vaginal fornix and secured to the sacral promontory. Patients were assessed with questionnaires and Cleveland Clinic scores.
RESULTS: Eighty patients, six males, median age 59 years (range 31-90) underwent laparoscopic prolapse surgery between Jan 1997 and Dec 2005; 55% had full thickness prolapse and 46% rectal anal intussusception. Five had a solitary rectal ulcer. A total of 58% had undergone previous surgery; hysterectomy 33%, posterior colporrhaphy 15%, posterior rectopexy 6%, Delorme's rectal mucosectomy 5% and Birch colposuspension 3%. Half (54%) were incontinent (mean Wexner score 11, range 2-17) and 31% reported symptoms of obstructed defecation; seven had slow transit constipation and underwent resection. The median operative time was 125 min (range 50-210) with one conversion. Median time to diet was 12 h and median length of stay 3 days (1-12). No patient has developed recurrent full thickness prolapse at a median follow-up of 54 months (30-96). Incontinence improved in 39 of 43 patients (91%); median post-operative Wexner score 1 (0-9). Obstructed defecation resolved in 20 of 25 patients (80%). Pelvic pain resolved in all but one. Complications occurred in 21%; faecal impaction 4%, wound infection 2%, bleeding 2%, leak 1%, chest infection 1%, retention 1%. Three developed minor evacuatory difficulties and two, urinary stress incontinence.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is safe with relatively low morbidity. In the medium-term, it provides good results for prolapse and associated symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17498206     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01259.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  42 in total

Review 1.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The optimal strategy for proximal mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Hendrik A Formijne Jonkers; Harm J van de Haar; Werner A Draaisma; Ben G F Heggelman; Esther C J Consten; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery Annual Report 2010: an educational review.

Authors:  L Zorcolo; P Giordano; A P Zbar; S D Wexner; F Seow-Choen; G L Occelli; G Casula
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Anterior intussusception descent during defecation is correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in patients with rectoanal intussusception.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; T Ohta; W Fujii; Y Kiyasu; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  Niels Wijffels; Chris Cunningham; Ian Lindsey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectoanal intussusception: prospective evaluation of clinical, physiological and morphological changes.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; K Hayashi; Y Yagi; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  [Complications after rectal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Lumbosacral discitis following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a rare but potentially serious complication.

Authors:  Z Vujovic; E Cuarana; K L Campbell; N Valentine; S Koch; D Ziyaie
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cristina B Geltzeiler; Elisa H Birnbaum; Matthew L Silviera; Matthew G Mutch; Joel Vetter; Paul E Wise; Steven R Hunt; Sean C Glasgow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Incidence and surgical treatment of synthetic mesh-related infectious complications after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

Authors:  F Borie; T Coste; J M Bigourdan; F Guillon
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.