Literature DB >> 17497831

Solution structures of a DNA dodecamer duplex with and without a cisplatin 1,2-d(GG) intrastrand cross-link: comparison with the same DNA duplex containing an oxaliplatin 1,2-d(GG) intrastrand cross-link.

Yibing Wu1, Debadeep Bhattacharyya, Candice L King, Irene Baskerville-Abraham, Sung-Ho Huh, Gunnar Boysen, James A Swenberg, Brenda Temple, Sharon L Campbell, Stephen G Chaney.   

Abstract

Proteins that discriminate between cisplatin-DNA adducts and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts are thought to be responsible for the differences in tumor range, toxicity, and mutagenicity of these two important chemotherapeutic agents. However, the structural basis for differential protein recognition of these adducts has not been determined and could be important for the design of more effective platinum anticancer agents. We have determined high-resolution NMR structures for cisplatin-GG and undamaged DNA dodecamers in the AGGC sequence context and have compared these structures with the oxaliplatin-GG structure in the same sequence context determined previously in our laboratory. This structural study allows the first direct comparison of cisplatin-GG DNA and oxaliplatin-GG DNA solution structures referenced to undamaged DNA in the same sequence context. Non-hydrogen atom rmsds of 0.81 and 1.21 were determined for the 15 lowest-energy structures for cisplatin-GG DNA and undamaged DNA, respectively, indicating good structural convergence. The theoretical NOESY spectra obtained by back-calculation from the final average structures showed excellent agreement with the experimental data, indicating that the final structures are consistent with the NMR data. Several significant conformational differences were observed between the cisplatin-GG adduct and the oxaliplatin-GG adduct, including buckle at the 5' G6.C19 base pair, opening at the 3' G7.C18 base pair, twist at the A5G6.T20C19 base pair step, slide, twist, and roll at the G6G7.C19C18 base pair step, slide at the G7C8.C18G17 base pair step, G6G7 dihedral angle, and overall bend angle. We hypothesize that these conformational differences may be related to the ability of various DNA repair proteins, DNA binding proteins, and DNA polymerases to discriminate between cisplatin-GG and oxaliplatin-GG adducts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17497831      PMCID: PMC2129171          DOI: 10.1021/bi062291f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  48 in total

1.  The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G x T mismatch.

Authors:  M H Lamers; A Perrakis; J H Enzlin; H H Winterwerp; N de Wind; T K Sixma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Improving the accuracy of NMR structures of DNA by means of a database potential of mean force describing base-base positional interactions.

Authors:  J Kuszewski; C Schwieters; G M Clore
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Relationship of solution and protein-bound structures of DNA duplexes with the major intrastrand cross-link lesions formed on cisplatin binding to DNA.

Authors:  L G Marzilli; J S Saad; Z Kuklenyik; K A Keating; Y Xu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-03-28       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Risk of second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of testicular cancer.

Authors:  L B Travis; R E Curtis; H Storm; P Hall; E Holowaty; F E Van Leeuwen; B A Kohler; E Pukkala; C F Lynch; M Andersson; K Bergfeldt; E A Clarke; T Wiklund; G Stoter; M Gospodarowicz; J Sturgeon; J F Fraumeni; J D Boice
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  HMG-domain protein recognition of cisplatin 1,2-intrastrand d(GpG) cross-links in purine-rich sequence contexts.

Authors:  S M Cohen; Y Mikata; Q He; S J Lippard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  The efficiency and fidelity of translesion synthesis past cisplatin and oxaliplatin GpG adducts by human DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  A Vaisman; S G Chaney
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  2.4 A crystal structure of an oxaliplatin 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link in a DNA dodecamer duplex.

Authors:  B Spingler; D A Whittington; S J Lippard
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA.

Authors:  G Obmolova; C Ban; P Hsieh; W Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of spectator ligands on the specific recognition of intrastrand platinum-DNA cross-links by high mobility group box and TATA-binding proteins.

Authors:  M Wei; S M Cohen; A P Silverman; S J Lippard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-08-20       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  MutS preferentially recognizes cisplatin- over oxaliplatin-modified DNA.

Authors:  Zoran Z Zdraveski; Jill A Mello; Christine K Farinelli; John M Essigmann; Martin G Marinus
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  15 in total

1.  Conformation of DNA GG intrastrand cross-link of antitumor oxaliplatin and its enantiomeric analog.

Authors:  Jaroslav Malina; Olga Novakova; Marie Vojtiskova; Giovanni Natile; Viktor Brabec
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Computational evidence for structural consequences of kiteplatin damage on DNA.

Authors:  Shaun T Mutter; Nicola Margiotta; Paride Papadia; James A Platts
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Structural basis of human DNA polymerase η-mediated chemoresistance to cisplatin.

Authors:  Ye Zhao; Christian Biertümpfel; Mark T Gregory; Yue-Jin Hua; Fumio Hanaoka; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural basis for the bypass of the major oxaliplatin-DNA adducts by human DNA polymerase η.

Authors:  Hala Ouzon-Shubeita; Meghan Baker; Myong-Chul Koag; Seongmin Lee
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  Unusual DNA binding modes for metal anticancer complexes.

Authors:  Ana M Pizarro; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.079

6.  Molecular dynamic simulations of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-d(GG) intrastand cross-links reveal differences in their conformational dynamics.

Authors:  Shantanu Sharma; Peng Gong; Brenda Temple; Debadeep Bhattacharyya; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Stephen G Chaney
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Inhibition of transcription by platinum antitumor compounds.

Authors:  Ryan C Todd; Stephen J Lippard
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.526

8.  Analysis of single, cisplatin-induced DNA bends by atomic force microscopy and simulations.

Authors:  Samrat Dutta; Claudio Rivetti; Natalie R Gassman; Carl G Young; Bradley T Jones; Karin Scarpinato; Martin Guthold
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.137

9.  How can the cisplatin analogs with different amine act on DNA during cancer treatment theoretically?

Authors:  Arezo Rahiminezhad; Mahboube Eslami Moghadam; Adeleh Divsalar; A Wahid Mesbah
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Detection and Characterization of Single Cisplatin Adducts on DNA by Nanopore Sequencing.

Authors:  Xinjia Zhao; Yuru Liu; Xiaoyu Chen; Zhuang Mi; Wei Li; Pengye Wang; Xinyan Shan; Xinghua Lu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.