Literature DB >> 11457140

Improving the accuracy of NMR structures of DNA by means of a database potential of mean force describing base-base positional interactions.

J Kuszewski1, C Schwieters, G M Clore.   

Abstract

NMR structure determination of nucleic acids presents an intrinsically difficult problem since the density of short interproton distance contacts is relatively low and limited to adjacent base pairs. Although residual dipolar couplings provide orientational information that is clearly helpful, they do not provide translational information of either a short-range (with the exception of proton-proton dipolar couplings) or long-range nature. As a consequence, the description of the nonbonded contacts has a major impact on the structures of nucleic acids generated from NMR data. In this paper, we describe the derivation of a potential of mean force derived from all high-resolution (2 A or better) DNA crystal structures available in the Nucleic Acid Database (NDB) as of May 2000 that provides a statistical description, in simple geometric terms, of the relative positions of pairs of neighboring bases (both intra- and interstrand) in Cartesian space. The purpose of this pseudopotential, which we term a DELPHIC base-base positioning potential, is to bias sampling during simulated annealing refinement to physically reasonable regions of conformational space within the range of possibilities that are consistent with the experimental NMR restraints. We illustrate the application of the DELPHIC base-base positioning potential to the structure refinement of a DNA dodecamer, d(CGCGAATTCGCG)(2), for which NOE and dipolar coupling data have been measured in solution and for which crystal structures have been determined. We demonstrate by cross-validation against independent NMR observables (that is, both residual dipolar couplings and NOE-derived intereproton distance restraints) that the DELPHIC base-base positioning potential results in a significant increase in accuracy and obviates artifactual distortions in the structures arising from the limitations of conventional descriptions of the nonbonded contacts in terms of either Lennard-Jones van der Waals and electrostatic potentials or a simple van der Waals repulsion potential. We also demonstrate, using experimental NMR data for a complex of the male sex determining factor SRY with a duplex DNA 14mer, which includes a region of highly unusual and distorted DNA, that the DELPHIC base-base positioning potential does not in any way hinder unusual interactions and conformations from being satisfactorily sampled and reproduced. We expect that the methodology described in this paper for DNA can be equally applied to RNA, as well as side chain-side chain interactions in proteins and protein-protein complexes, and side chain-nucleic acid interactions in protein-nucleic acid complexes. Further, this approach should be useful not only for NMR structure determination but also for refinement of low-resolution (3-3.5 A) X-ray data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11457140     DOI: 10.1021/ja010033u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  35 in total

1.  Residual dipolar coupling constants and structure determination of large DNA duplexes.

Authors:  Olivier Mauffret; Georges Tevanian; Serge Fermandjian
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Determination of DNA minor groove width in distamycin-DNA complexes by solid-state NMR.

Authors:  Greg L Olsen; Elizabeth A Louie; Gary P Drobny; Snorri Th Sigurdsson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Solution structure of (gamma)S-crystallin by molecular fragment replacement NMR.

Authors:  Zhengrong Wu; Frank Delaglio; Keith Wyatt; Graeme Wistow; Ad Bax
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  X-ray diffraction "fingerprinting" of DNA structure in solution for quantitative evaluation of molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Xiaobing Zuo; Guanglei Cui; Kenneth M Merz; Ligang Zhang; Frederick D Lewis; David M Tiede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens: implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions.

Authors:  Katrin Lehmann; Kristian Schweimer; Gerald Reese; Stefanie Randow; Martin Suhr; Wolf-Meinhard Becker; Stefan Vieths; Paul Rösch
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Structural basis of DNA recognition by the alternative sigma-factor, sigma54.

Authors:  Michaeleen Doucleff; Jeffrey G Pelton; Peter S Lee; B Tracy Nixon; David E Wemmer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  X-ray scattering combined with coordinate-based analyses for applications in natural and artificial photosynthesis.

Authors:  David M Tiede; Kristy L Mardis; Xiaobing Zuo
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  S Campagne; V Gervais; A Milon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  High-resolution NMR structure of an RNA model system: the 14-mer cUUCGg tetraloop hairpin RNA.

Authors:  Senada Nozinovic; Boris Fürtig; Hendrik R A Jonker; Christian Richter; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Intrinsic flexibility of B-DNA: the experimental TRX scale.

Authors:  Brahim Heddi; Christophe Oguey; Christophe Lavelle; Nicolas Foloppe; Brigitte Hartmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.