Literature DB >> 17497571

Reproducibility of a laboratory based 20-km time trial evaluation in competitive cyclists using the Velotron Pro ergometer.

B C Sporer1, D C McKenzie.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a 20-km cycling time trial using the Velotron cycle ergometer in competitive cyclists. Twenty male cyclists (V.O (2max) = 68.5 +/- 3.6 ml . kg (-1) . min (-1); peak power (P (peak)) = 469 +/- 33 W) participated in this study. Each subject performed a V.O (2max) test and 3 separate 20-km time trials (TT1, TT2, and TT3). Data from trials were compared using a one-way ANOVA. Coefficients of variation (CV) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated between trials. Values are mean +/- SD unless otherwise noted. Performance time T (tot) (30.03 +/- 1.24, 30.12 +/- 1.21, and 30.14 +/- 1.21 min) and mean absolute power (P (mean)) (326 +/- 35, 323 +/- 35, 322 +/- 34 Watts) were not significantly different across TT1 - TT3. P (mean) was highly related between TT1 - TT2 (r = 0.96; p < 0.01) and TT2 - TT3 (r = 0.97; p < 0.01). A low CV was also demonstrated between trials for P (mean) (TT1 - TT2 = 2.1 %, CI = 1.6 % to 3.1 %; TT2 - TT3 = 1.9 %, CI = 1.4 % to 2.8 %). P (peak) and P (mean) were both correlated to T (tot) in TT1 with P (mean) accounting for most of the variance in T (tot) (R (2) = 0.993). These data show that performance in a 20-km time trial using the Velotron ergometer is highly reproducible in competitive cyclists. Furthermore, the CV variance demonstrated between trials is comparable to that expected during actual performance in elite athletes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17497571     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-964977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  8 in total

1.  The reliability of a simulated uphill time trial using the Velotron electronic bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  Eric E Noreen; Kathyrn Yamamoto; Kelli Clair
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Reproducibility of pacing strategy during simulated 20-km cycling time trials in well-trained cyclists.

Authors:  Kevin Thomas; Mark R Stone; Kevin G Thompson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Les Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Consistency of perceptual and metabolic responses to a laboratory-based simulated 4,000-m cycling time trial.

Authors:  Mark R Stone; Kevin Thomas; Michael Wilkinson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Kevin G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Post-exercise Ingestion of Carbohydrate, Protein and Water: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Effects on Subsequent Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Danielle McCartney; Ben Desbrow; Christopher Irwin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Heliox breathing equally influences respiratory mechanics and cycling performance in trained males and females.

Authors:  Sabrina S Wilkie; Paolo B Dominelli; Benjamin C Sporer; Michael S Koehle; A William Sheel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants.

Authors:  Andrew W Hibbert; François Billaut; Matthew C Varley; Remco C J Polman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Lack of a Dose Response from 7 Days of Ischemic Preconditioning in Moderately trained Cyclists.

Authors:  Angus Lindsay; Carl Petersen; Hamish Ferguson; Gavin Blackwell; Stephen Rickerby
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2018-09-07

8.  Programmed vs. Thirst-Driven Drinking during Prolonged Cycling in a Warm Environment.

Authors:  David Jeker; Pascale Claveau; Mohamed El Fethi Abed; Thomas A Deshayes; Claude Lajoie; Philippe Gendron; Martin D Hoffman; Eric D B Goulet
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.