Literature DB >> 17496645

Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with nucleus RP 8 and freedom system.

B P Weber1, W K Lai, N Dillier, E L von Wallenberg, M J P Killian, J Pesch, R D Battmer, T Lenarz.   

Abstract

Cochlear recently released the Nucleus Freedom System which has been based on the Nucleus Research Platform 8. Both systems make use of the same implant, the CI24RE, which includes expanded total stimulation rates up to 32 kHz. In this study the performance of the ACE strategy at 500, 1200 and 3500 pps/channel was investigated using an ABC-CBA design. At the end of each period speech tests were performed. In the CBA phase the patients completed a comparative questionnaire to determine the subjective rate preference. Preliminary results in 13 recipients indicate no differences in for the ACE strategy at rates ranging from 500 pps to 3500 pps/channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496645     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180315442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  9 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

2.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

3.  The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Hugh J McDermott; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bournique; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sung Hye Park; Eunoak Kim; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyung-Jong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.