Literature DB >> 17495718

The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

Alexander Strehl1, Stefan Eggli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thirty-eight of the 73 consecutive acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) proven by a magnetic resonance imaging scan (MRI) in skeletally mature patients (16-55 years old) were classified as suitable for primarily conservative treatment. Patient selection was performed using a preoperative screening protocol based on the structural damage, clinical symptoms, compliance, sportive activity, and the consent of a well-informed patient.
METHODS: In 12 of the 38 treated patients, the conservative protocol showed a good to very good outcome, 2 patients had persistent giving-way and were considering ACL reconstruction, 14 patients had a secondary ACL reconstruction in our clinic (average 5.3 months after injury), 9 patients were operated on in other hospitals (average 13.3 months after injury), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: All patients with successful conservative treatment were able to perform low-risk pivoting sports and two patients are practicing high-risk pivoting sports. The average International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 92.5 (82.8-98.9); the subjective overall knee function was 93% (60% to 100%). Of the 12 patients with good and very good results, 6 continued playing the same sports at an unreduced intensity, 4 patients reduced their activities slightly, and 1 patient played more sports than before.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the authors performed a preoperative screening to select patients suitable for conservative treatment, almost two-thirds of the primarily conservatively treated ACL ruptures needed an operative reconstruction in the long term. In one-third of the patients, conservative treatment led to a good or very good result. At the endpoint of the study only 12 (16%) of a total of 73 patients with acute injuries of the ACL had successful conservative treatment. Therefore, patients must be comprehensively instructed about the treatment program and the chances of success of conservative ACL treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495718     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31805006e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  29 in total

1.  Knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than forty years: comparison between different age groups.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Conteduca Fabio; Ludovico Caperna; Caperna Ludovico; Andrea Ferretti; Ferretti Andrea; Raffaele Iorio; Iorio Raffaele; Carolina Civitenga; Civitenga Carolina; Antonio Ponzo; Ponzo Antonio
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment.

Authors:  M A Kessler; H Behrend; S Henz; G Stutz; A Rukavina; M S Kuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Determining utility values in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears using clinical scoring systems.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber; Thomas Szucs; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S van Grinsven; R E H van Cingel; C J M Holla; C J M van Loon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  ACL rupture in the immediate build-up to the Olympic Games: return to elite alpine ski competition 5 months after injury and ACL repair.

Authors:  Cesar Praz; Vikram Kishor Kandhari; Adnan Saithna; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-15

6.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than fifty years: a comparison with a younger age group.

Authors:  Raffaele Iorio; Ferdinando Iannotti; Antonio Ponzo; Lorenzo Proietti; Andrea Redler; Fabio Conteduca; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Peter Gföller; Elisabeth Abermann; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Mario Pflüglmayer; Guido Wierer; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  LARS™ in ACL reconstruction: evaluation of 60 cases with 5-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  G Bugelli; G Dell'Osso; F Ascione; E Gori; V Bottai; S Giannotti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

10.  Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Ludwig Oberkircher; Karl F Schüttler; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.