Literature DB >> 17495574

Performance obstacles of intensive care nurses.

Ayse P Gurses1, Pascale Carayon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The work environment of intensive care nurses may have substantial impact on both nursing outcomes and patient safety. The factors in a nurse's immediate work environment, in the local work context, have not been studied in detail to provide useful, specific information for work redesign efforts to improve nurse's work and patient safety. Performance obstacles are the factors that hinder intensive care nurses' capacity to perform their jobs and that are associated closely with their immediate work environment.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the performance obstacles experienced by intensive care nurses in their work environment.
METHODS: A multisite, cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected using a 36-item questionnaire and analyzed using univariate statistical analysis. The frequencies of performance obstacles reported by intensive care nurses were computed.
RESULTS: Nurses (n = 272) from 17 intensive care units (ICUs) of seven hospitals in Wisconsin participated in the study. The most frequently experienced performance obstacles included noisy work environment (46%), distractions from families (42%), hectic (40%) and crowded work environments (37%), delay in getting medications from pharmacy (36%), spending considerable amount of time teaching families (34%), equipment not being available-someone else using it (32%), patient rooms not well-stocked (32%), insufficient workspace for completing paperwork (26%), seeking for supplies (24%) or patients' charts (23%), receiving many phone calls from families (23%), delay in seeing new medical orders (21%), and misplaced equipment (20%). DISCUSSION: Intensive care nurses experience a variety of performance obstacles in their work environment. Future research should investigate the impact of various performance obstacles on nursing workload, nursing quality of working life, and quality and safety of care, as well as the impact of interventions aimed at redesigning the work system of ICU nurses to remove performance obstacles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495574     DOI: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270028.75112.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  30 in total

Review 1.  Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie L Novak; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Value of human factors to medication and patient safety in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  MEASURING WORKLOAD OF ICU NURSES WITH A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY: THE NASA TASK LOAD INDEX (TLX).

Authors:  Peter Hoonakker; Pascale Carayon; Ayse Gurses; Roger Brown; Kerry McGuire; Adjhaporn Khunlertkit; James M Walker
Journal:  IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng       Date:  2011-10-12

4.  Sociotechnical systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

5.  Front-line staff perspectives on opportunities for improving the safety and efficiency of hospital work systems.

Authors:  Anita L Tucker; Sara J Singer; Jennifer E Hayes; Alyson Falwell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Intravenous medication administration in intensive care: opportunities for technological solutions.

Authors:  Jacqueline Moss; Eta Berner; Olaf Bothe; Irina Rymarchuk
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

7.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Patrick Ferdinande
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Introduction of open visiting policy in intensive care units in Ukraine: policy analysis and the ethical perspective.

Authors:  Igor A Zupanets; Viktoriia Ye Dobrova; Kseniia L Ratushna; Sergii O Silchenko
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-07-21

Review 9.  A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Sarah Kianfar; Yaqiong Li; Anping Xie; Bashar Alyousef; Abigail Wooldridge
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Impact of human factors on clinical protocol performance: a proposed assessment framework and case examples.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Steen Andreassen; Karsten Jensen; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.