Literature DB >> 17495035

Genetically manipulated mice: a powerful tool with unsuspected caveats.

Klaus I Matthaei1.   

Abstract

Although genetic manipulations in mice have provided a powerful tool for investigating gene function in vivo, recent studies have uncovered a number of developmental phenomena that complicate the attribution of phenotype to the specific genetic change. A more realistic approach has been to modulate gene expression and function in a temporal and tissue-specific manner. The most common of these methods, the CreLoxP and tetracycline response systems, are surveyed here and their recently identified shortcomings discussed, along with a less well known system based on the E. coli lac operon and modified for use in mammals. The potential for further complications in interpretation due to hitherto unexpected epigenetic effects involving transfer of RNA or protein in oocytes or sperm is also explored. Given these problems we reiterate the necessity for the use of completely reversible methods that will allow each experimental group of animals to act as their own control. Using these methods with a number of specific modifications to eliminate non-specific effects from random insertion sites and inducer molecules, the full potential of genetic manipulation studies should be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495035      PMCID: PMC2075346          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  39 in total

1.  Targeted insertion of Cre recombinase into the TNAP gene: excision in primordial germ cells.

Authors:  H Lomelí; V Ramos-Mejía; M Gertsenstein; C G Lobe; A Nagy
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse.

Authors:  Minoo Rassoulzadegan; Valérie Grandjean; Pierre Gounon; Stéphane Vincent; Isabelle Gillot; François Cuzin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Expression of the reverse tetracycline-transactivator gene causes emphysema-like changes in mice.

Authors:  Thomas H Sisson; Jean M Hansen; Mitali Shah; Kerstin E Hanson; Ming Du; Tony Ling; Richard H Simon; Paul J Christensen
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 6.914

4.  Mammalian genomes contain active recombinase recognition sites.

Authors:  B Thyagarajan; M J Guimarães; A C Groth; M P Calos
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Stable correction of a genetic deficiency in human cells by an episome carrying a 115 kb genomic transgene.

Authors:  R Wade-Martins; R E White; H Kimura; P R Cook; M R James
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  The lac operator-repressor system is functional in the mouse.

Authors:  C A Cronin; W Gluba; H Scrable
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Fine-structure mapping of the murine IL-3 and GM-CSF genes by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and molecular cloning.

Authors:  J S Lee; I G Young
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP.

Authors:  G Feng; R H Mellor; M Bernstein; C Keller-Peck; Q T Nguyen; M Wallace; J M Nerbonne; J W Lichtman; J R Sanes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Pharmacologic and functional characterization of malignant hyperthermia in the R163C RyR1 knock-in mouse.

Authors:  Tianzhong Yang; Joyce Riehl; Eric Esteve; Klaus I Matthaei; Samuel Goth; Paul D Allen; Isaac N Pessah; José R Lopez
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Generation of yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mice by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Pedro N Moreira; Julio Pozueta; Patricia Giraldo; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2006
View more
  32 in total

1.  Targeted single-cell electroporation of mammalian neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Benjamin Judkewitz; Matteo Rizzi; Kazuo Kitamura; Michael Häusser
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  In vivo RNAi screens: concepts and applications.

Authors:  Shane Crotty; Matthew E Pipkin
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 3.  Considerations and guidelines for mouse metabolic phenotyping in diabetes research.

Authors:  Thierry Alquier; Vincent Poitout
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Neuroanatomical and functional characterization of CRF neurons of the amygdala using a novel transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  P N De Francesco; S Valdivia; A Cabral; M Reynaldo; J Raingo; I Sakata; S Osborne-Lawrence; J M Zigman; M Perelló
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Screening strategy to generate cell specific recombination: a case report with the RIP-Cre mice.

Authors:  Valeria Spinelli; Céline Martin; Emilie Dorchies; Emmanuelle Vallez; Hélène Dehondt; Mohamed-Sami Trabelsi; Anne Tailleux; Sandrine Caron; Bart Staels
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Modeling the positive symptoms of schizophrenia in genetically modified mice: pharmacology and methodology aspects.

Authors:  Maarten van den Buuse
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Beyond knockouts: cre resources for conditional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Stephen A Murray; Janan T Eppig; Damian Smedley; Elizabeth M Simpson; Nadia Rosenthal
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Growth arrest specific 1 (GAS1) is abundantly expressed in the adult mouse central nervous system.

Authors:  Natanael Zarco; Elizabeth Bautista; Manola Cuéllar; Paula Vergara; Paola Flores-Rodriguez; Raúl Aguilar-Roblero; José Segovia
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?

Authors:  Kate M Lesciotto; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Comparing effects of mTR and mTERT deletion on gene expression and DNA damage response: a critical examination of telomere length maintenance-independent roles of telomerase.

Authors:  Sofia L Vidal-Cardenas; Carol W Greider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.