Amy M Lando1, Judith Labiner-Wolfe. 1. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA. amy.lando@fda.hhs.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To understand consumer (1) interest in nutrition information on food labels and quick-service restaurant menu boards and (2) reactions to modifying this information to help highlight calories and more healthful choices. DESIGN: Eight consumer focus groups, using a guide and stimuli. SETTING: Focus group discussions in 4 US cities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 68 consumers, with 7 to 10 per focus group. ANALYSIS: Authors prepared detailed summaries of discussions based on observation. Video recordings and transcripts were used to cross-check summaries. Data were systematically reviewed, synthesized, and analyzed. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Consumer views on alternative presentations of nutrition information on packaged food items and quick-service restaurant menu boards. RESULTS: Participants (1) were interested in having nutrition information available, but would not use it at every eating occasion; (2) thought that food products typically consumed at 1 eating occasion should be labeled as a single serving; and (3) indicated that an icon on labels and menu boards that signaled more healthful options could be helpful. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings provide a basis for the development of more systematic studies to better understand whether alternative presentations of nutrition information would help consumers.
OBJECTIVES: To understand consumer (1) interest in nutrition information on food labels and quick-service restaurant menu boards and (2) reactions to modifying this information to help highlight calories and more healthful choices. DESIGN: Eight consumer focus groups, using a guide and stimuli. SETTING: Focus group discussions in 4 US cities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 68 consumers, with 7 to 10 per focus group. ANALYSIS: Authors prepared detailed summaries of discussions based on observation. Video recordings and transcripts were used to cross-check summaries. Data were systematically reviewed, synthesized, and analyzed. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Consumer views on alternative presentations of nutrition information on packaged food items and quick-service restaurant menu boards. RESULTS:Participants (1) were interested in having nutrition information available, but would not use it at every eating occasion; (2) thought that food products typically consumed at 1 eating occasion should be labeled as a single serving; and (3) indicated that an icon on labels and menu boards that signaled more healthful options could be helpful. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings provide a basis for the development of more systematic studies to better understand whether alternative presentations of nutrition information would help consumers.
Authors: Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Elaine L Larson; Christina Araujo; Vanessa Sawyer; Olajide Williams Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Rebecca C Fitch; Lisa J Harnack; Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer; Mary T Story; Simone A French; J Michael Oakes; Sarah A Rydell Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2009 Nov-Dec
Authors: Christina A Roberto; Marie A Bragg; Marissa J Seamans; Regine L Mechulan; Nicole Novak; Kelly D Brownell Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Nathalie Kliemann; Mariana V S Kraemer; Tailane Scapin; Vanessa M Rodrigues; Ana C Fernandes; Greyce L Bernardo; Paula L Uggioni; Rossana P C Proença Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.717