Literature DB >> 17492826

Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses.

K Jack Ishak1, Robert W Platt, Lawrence Joseph, James A Hanley.   

Abstract

Multivariate meta-analyses are used to derive summary estimates of treatment effects for two or more outcomes from a joint model. In addition to treatment effects, these models also quantify the correlations between outcomes across studies. To be fully specified, the model requires an estimate of the covariance or correlations between outcomes observed in each study. These are rarely available in published reports, so that analysts must either approximate these or ignore correlations between effect estimates from the same studies. We examined the impact of errors in approximating within-study covariances on the parameters of multivariate models in a simulation study. We found that treatment effect and heterogeneity estimates were not strongly affected by inaccurate approximations, but estimates of the correlation between outcomes were sometimes highly biased. The potential for error is greatest when the covariance between outcomes within- and between-studies are of comparable scale.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17492826     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Longitudinal aggregate data model-based meta-analysis with NONMEM: approaches to handling within treatment arm correlation.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Jonathan L French
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Multivariate meta-analysis with an increasing number of parameters.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Joshua N Sampson
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Multilevel Multivariate Meta-analysis with Application to Choice Overload.

Authors:  Blakeley B McShane; Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Random-effects meta-analysis of combined outcomes based on reconstructions of individual patient data.

Authors:  Yue Song; Feng Sun; Susan Redline; Rui Wang
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.

Authors:  Chuan Hong; Richard D Riley; Yong Chen
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  Meta-analysis methods for multiple related markers: Applications to microbiome studies with the results on multiple α-diversity indices.

Authors:  Hyunwook Koh; Susan Tuddenham; Cynthia L Sears; Ni Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Richard Riley; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Cue-reactivity in behavioral addictions: A meta-analysis and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Katrin Starcke; Stephanie Antons; Patrick Trotzke; Matthias Brand
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.756

9.  Modelling time-course relationships with multiple treatments: Model-based network meta-analysis for continuous summary outcomes.

Authors:  Hugo Pedder; Sofia Dias; Margherita Bennetts; Martin Boucher; Nicky J Welton
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian White; J B Kostis; A C Wilson; A R Folsom; K Wu; L Chambless; M Benderly; U Goldbourt; J Willeit; S Kiechl; J W G Yarnell; P M Sweetnam; P C Elwood; M Cushman; B M Psaty; R P Tracy; A Tybjaerg-Hansen; F Haverkate; M P M de Maat; S G Thompson; F G R Fowkes; A J Lee; F B Smith; V Salomaa; K Harald; V Rasi; E Vahtera; P Jousilahti; R D'Agostino; W B Kannel; P W F Wilson; G Tofler; D Levy; R Marchioli; F Valagussa; A Rosengren; L Wilhelmsen; G Lappas; H Eriksson; P Cremer; D Nagel; J D Curb; B Rodriguez; K Yano; J T Salonen; K Nyyssönen; T-P Tuomainen; B Hedblad; G Engström; G Berglund; H Loewel; W Koenig; H W Hense; T W Meade; J A Cooper; B De Stavola; C Knottenbelt; G J Miller; J A Cooper; K A Bauer; R D Rosenberg; S Sato; A Kitamura; Y Naito; H Iso; V Salomaa; K Harald; V Rasi; E Vahtera; P Jousilahti; T Palosuo; P Ducimetiere; P Amouyel; D Arveiler; A E Evans; J Ferrieres; I Juhan-Vague; A Bingham; H Schulte; G Assmann; B Cantin; B Lamarche; J-P Despres; G R Dagenais; H Tunstall-Pedoe; G D O Lowe; M Woodward; Y Ben-Shlomo; G Davey Smith; V Palmieri; J L Yeh; T W Meade; A Rudnicka; P Brennan; C Knottenbelt; J A Cooper; P Ridker; F Rodeghiero; A Tosetto; J Shepherd; G D O Lowe; I Ford; M Robertson; E Brunner; M Shipley; E J M Feskens; E Di Angelantonio; S Kaptoge; S Lewington; G D O Lowe; N Sarwar; S G Thompson; M Walker; S Watson; I R White; A M Wood; J Danesh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.