Literature DB >> 17491156

State-of-the-art embryo technologies in cattle.

P Lonergan1.   

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, basic and applied studies on classical and advanced embryo technologies have generated a vast literature on factors regulating oocyte and embryo development and quality. In addition, over this period, commercial bovine embryo transfer has become a large international business. It is well recognised that bovine embryos derived in vivo are of superior quality to those derived from in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture. Relatively little has changed in the techniques of producing embryos in vivo although there is increasing evidence of the importance of, for example, peripheral and follicular endocrine profiles for the subsequent developmental competence of the embryo. The in vitro production of ruminant embryos is a three-step process involving oocyte maturation, oocyte fertilization and in vitro culture. Only 30-40% of such oocytes reach the blastocyst stage, at which they can be transferred to a recipient or frozen for future use. We know now that the quality of the oocyte is crucial in determining the proportion of immature oocytes that form blastocysts while the post-fertilization culture environment has a major influence on the quality of the blastocyst. Use of sexed-sorted sperm in conjunction with in vitro embryo production is a potentially efficient means of obtaining offspring of the desired sex. Concerns regarding the use of sexed semen technology include the apparent lower fertility of sorted sperm, the lower survival of sorted sperm after cryopreservation and the reduced number of sperm that could be separated in a specified time period. Assessment of embryo quality is a challenge. Morphological assessment is at present the most popular method for embryo selection prior to transfer. Other non-invasive assessment methods include the timing of the first cleavage division which has been linked to developmental ability. Quantitative examination of gene expression is an additional valuable tool to assess the viability of cultured embryos. A substantial amount of evidence exists to demonstrate that the culture conditions to which the embryo is exposed, particularly in the post-fertilization period, can have perturbing effects on the pattern of gene expression in the embryo with potentially important long-term consequences. Collectively, in vivo and in vitro studies support the notion that the environment of the embryo is critical for its future. The identification and characterization of the short-term effects of in vitro culture raises the question about long-term consequences and safety of assisted reproductive technologies. The impact of some of these technologies on animal production will be the subject of this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17491156     DOI: 10.5661/rdr-vi-315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl        ISSN: 1747-3403


  17 in total

1.  Candidate gene expression patterns in rabbit preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Gibence Rose Winnie Henderson; Sambasiva Rao Brahmasani; Uma Mahesh Yelisetti; Suman Konijeti; Venu Charan Katari; Shivaji Sisinthy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Thomas W Geary; Peter J Hansen; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Midkine and cytoplasmic maturation of mammalian oocytes in the context of ovarian follicle physiology.

Authors:  Shuntaro Ikeda; Masayasu Yamada
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Improved low-CPA vitrification of mouse oocytes using quartz microcapillary.

Authors:  Jung Kyu Choi; Haishui Huang; Xiaoming He
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Nuclear maturation and structural components of nonhuman primate cumulus-oocyte complexes during in vivo and in vitro maturation.

Authors:  Jenna K Nyholt de Prada; Dana L Hill; Charles L Chaffin; Catherine A VandeVoort
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Evidence of haptoglobin in the porcine female genital tract during oestrous cycle and its effect on in vitro embryo production.

Authors:  Francisco A García-Vázquez; Carla Moros-Nicolás; Rebeca López-Úbeda; Ernesto Rodríguez-Tobón; Ascensión Guillén-Martínez; Jason W Ross; Chiara Luongo; Carmen Matás; Iván Hernández-Caravaca; Manuel Avilés; Mª José Izquierdo-Rico
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cell arrest and cell death in mammalian preimplantation development: lessons from the bovine model.

Authors:  Sandra Leidenfrost; Marc Boelhauve; Myriam Reichenbach; Tuna Güngör; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Fred Sinowatz; Eckhard Wolf; Felix A Habermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterization of the altered gene expression profile in early porcine embryos generated from parthenogenesis and somatic cell chromatin transfer.

Authors:  Chi Zhou; John Dobrinsky; Stephen Tsoi; George R Foxcroft; Walter T Dixon; Paul Stothard; John Verstegen; Michael K Dyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of ovarian cyclic status on in vitro embryo production in cattle.

Authors:  Akbar Pirestani; Sayyed Morteza Hosseini; Mahdi Hajian; Mohsen Forouzanfar; Fariba Moulavi; Parvaneh Abedi; Hamid Gourabi; Abdolhossein Shahverdi; Ahmad Vosough Taqi Dizaj; Mohammad Hossein Nasr Esfahani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02-20

10.  Effects of fertility on gene expression and function of the bovine endometrium.

Authors:  Megan A Minten; Todd R Bilby; Ralph G S Bruno; Carolyn C Allen; Crystal A Madsen; Zeping Wang; Jason E Sawyer; Ahmed Tibary; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas W Geary; Stefan Bauersachs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.