Literature DB >> 17490993

Sparseness constrains the prolongation of memory lifetime via synaptic metaplasticity.

Christian Leibold1, Richard Kempter.   

Abstract

Synaptic changes impair previously acquired memory traces. The smaller this impairment the larger is the longevity of memories. Two strategies have been suggested to keep memories from being overwritten too rapidly while preserving receptiveness to new contents: either introducing synaptic meta levels that store the history of synaptic state changes or reducing the number of synchronously active neurons, which decreases interference. We find that synaptic metaplasticity indeed can prolong memory lifetimes but only under the restriction that the neuronal population code is not too sparse. For sparse codes, metaplasticity may actually hinder memory longevity. This is important because in memory-related brain regions as the hippocampus population codes are sparse. Comparing 2 different synaptic cascade models with binary weights, we find that a serial topology of synaptic state transitions gives rise to larger memory capacities than a model with cross transitions. For the serial model, memory capacity is virtually independent of network size and connectivity.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17490993     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  16 in total

1.  Capacity analysis in multi-state synaptic models: a retrieval probability perspective.

Authors:  Yibi Huang; Yali Amit
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Regulation of gamma-frequency oscillation by feedforward inhibition: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  César Rennó-Costa; Daniel Garcia Teixeira; Ivan Soltesz
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  A saturation hypothesis to explain both enhanced and impaired learning with enhanced plasticity.

Authors:  Td Barbara Nguyen-Vu; Grace Q Zhao; Subhaneil Lahiri; Rhea R Kimpo; Hanmi Lee; Surya Ganguli; Carla J Shatz; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Hebbian plasticity in parallel synaptic pathways: A circuit mechanism for systems memory consolidation.

Authors:  Michiel W H Remme; Urs Bergmann; Denis Alevi; Susanne Schreiber; Henning Sprekeler; Richard Kempter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Learning with a network of competing synapses.

Authors:  Ajaz Ahmad Bhat; Gaurang Mahajan; Anita Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recurrent network of perceptrons with three state synapses achieves competitive classification on real inputs.

Authors:  Yali Amit; Jacob Walker
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Soft-bound synaptic plasticity increases storage capacity.

Authors:  Mark C W van Rossum; Maria Shippi; Adam B Barrett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Optimal learning rules for discrete synapses.

Authors:  Adam B Barrett; M C W van Rossum
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Long memory lifetimes require complex synapses and limited sparseness.

Authors:  Daniel D Ben Dayan Rubin; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Optimal recall from bounded metaplastic synapses: predicting functional adaptations in hippocampal area CA3.

Authors:  Cristina Savin; Peter Dayan; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.