Literature DB >> 30990954

Regulation of gamma-frequency oscillation by feedforward inhibition: A computational modeling study.

César Rennó-Costa1,2, Daniel Garcia Teixeira1,2,3, Ivan Soltesz4.   

Abstract

Throughout the brain, reciprocally connected excitatory and inhibitory neurons interact to produce gamma-frequency oscillations. The emergent gamma rhythm synchronizes local neural activity and helps to select which cells should fire in each cycle. We previously found that such excitation-inhibition microcircuits, however, have a potentially significant caveat: the frequency of the gamma oscillation and the level of selection (i.e., the percentage of cells that are allowed to fire) vary with the magnitude of the input signal. In networks with varying levels of brain activity, such a feature may produce undesirable instability on the time and spatial structure of the neural signal with a potential for adversely impacting important neural processing mechanisms. Here we propose that feedforward inhibition solves the latter instability problem of the excitation-inhibition microcircuit. Using computer simulations, we show that the feedforward inhibitory signal reduces the dependence of both the frequency of population oscillation and the level of selection on the magnitude of the input excitation. Such a mechanism can produce stable gamma oscillations with its frequency determined only by the properties of the feedforward network, as observed in the hippocampus. As feedforward and feedback inhibition motifs commonly appear together in the brain, we hypothesize that their interaction underlies a robust implementation of general computational principles of neural processing involved in several cognitive tasks, including the formation of cell assemblies and the routing of information between brain areas.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer model; gamma frequency; inhibition; phase coding; winner-take-all

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30990954      PMCID: PMC6744957          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  89 in total

1.  Two networks of electrically coupled inhibitory neurons in neocortex.

Authors:  J R Gibson; M Beierlein; B W Connors
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  New roles for the gamma rhythm: population tuning and preprocessing for the Beta rhythm.

Authors:  Mette S Olufsen; Miles A Whittington; Marcelo Camperi; Nancy Kopell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Excitatory synaptic interactions between CA3 neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus.

Authors:  R Miles; R K Wong
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  CA1 pyramidal cell diversity enabling parallel information processing in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Ivan Soltesz; Attila Losonczy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The mechanism of rate remapping in the dentate gyrus.

Authors:  César Rennó-Costa; John E Lisman; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of local field potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task.

Authors:  Adriano B L Tort; Mark A Kramer; Catherine Thorn; Daniel J Gibson; Yasuo Kubota; Ann M Graybiel; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attention reduces stimulus-driven gamma frequency oscillations and spike field coherence in V1.

Authors:  Matthew Chalk; Jose L Herrero; Mark A Gieselmann; Louise S Delicato; Sascha Gotthardt; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Integrating new findings and examining clinical applications of pattern separation.

Authors:  Stephanie L Leal; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Anatomical and electrophysiological comparison of CA1 pyramidal neurons of the rat and mouse.

Authors:  Brandy N Routh; Daniel Johnston; Kristen Harris; Raymond A Chitwood
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal-hippocampal system.

Authors:  James L Butler; Y Audrey Hay; Ole Paulsen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  1 in total

1.  Recurrent Excitatory Feedback From Mossy Cells Enhances Sparsity and Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus via Indirect Feedback Inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandro R Galloni; Aya Samadzelkava; Kiran Hiremath; Reuben Oumnov; Aaron D Milstein
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.380

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.