Literature DB >> 17489500

Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: a simple yet unresolved issue.

Khin T Win1, John A Fulcher.   

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are now in widespread use in healthcare institutions worldwide. EHRs include sensitive health information and if they are integrated among healthcare providers, data can be accessible from many different sources. This leads to increased concern regarding invasion of privacy and confidentiality. Incorporating consent mechanisms into EHRs has the potential to enhance confidentiality. However there are both positive and negative effects from employing such mechanisms--they need to balance privacy, safety, consumer and public interest.

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17489500     DOI： 10.1007/s10916-006-9030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN： 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  11 in total

Review 1.  Consumer health informatics.

Authors:  G Eysenbach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

2.  Confidentiality and the courts.

Authors:  P Gerber
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Informed consent for cancer registration.

Authors:  J Dudeck
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  e-Consent: The design and implementation of consumer consent mechanisms in an electronic environment.

Authors:  Enrico Coiera; Roger Clarke
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Informed consent and the security of the electronic health record (EHR): some policy considerations.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  A technological model to define access to electronic clinical records.

Authors:  Andrew Dalley; John Fulcher; David Bomba; Ken Lynch; Peter Feltham
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2005-06

7.  A review of security of electronic health records.

Authors:  Khin Than Win
Journal:  Health Inf Manag       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.185

8.  Is consent in medicine a concept only of modern times?

Authors:  P Dalla-Vorgia; J Lascaratos; P Skiadas; T Garanis-Papadatos
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Maintaining the confidentiality of medical records shared over the Internet and the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D M Rind; I S Kohane; P Szolovits; C Safran; H C Chueh; G O Barnett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Electronic medical records and patient privacy.

Authors:  I V Goldberg
Journal:  Health Care Manag (Frederick)       Date:  2000-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Electronic hand-drafting and picture management system.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Yang; Cheng-Yuan Ku; David C Yen; Wen-Huai Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.

Authors:  Mehmet Top; Ali Yilmaz; Erdem Karabulut; Ochieng George Otieno; Melahat Saylam; Sevgi Bakır; Sümbül Top
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Katja Stramer; Tanja Bratan; Emma Byrne; Yara Mohammad; Jill Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-23

4.  Architecture of a consent management suite and integration into IHE-based Regional Health Information Networks.

Authors:  Oliver Heinze; Markus Birkle; Lennart Köster; Björn Bergh
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  The prevalence of diagnosed chronic conditions and multimorbidity in Australia: A method for estimating population prevalence from general practice patient encounter data.

Authors:  Christopher Harrison; Joan Henderson; Graeme Miller; Helena Britt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The generic Informed Consent Service gICS®: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research.

Authors:  Henriette Rau; Lars Geidel; Martin Bialke; Arne Blumentritt; Martin Langanke; Wenke Liedtke; Sandra Pasewald; Dana Stahl; Thomas Bahls; Christian Maier; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  The Importance of Relevance: Willingness to Share eHealth Data for Family Medicine Research.

Authors:  Gillian Bartlett; Brenda Macgibbon; Analia Rubinowicz; Cecilia Nease; Martin Dawes; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.