Literature DB >> 17488120

Intragenic crop improvement: combining the benefits of traditional breeding and genetic engineering.

Caius M Rommens1.   

Abstract

New crop varieties are developed by applying traditional breeding methods that rely on random genome modifications. These varieties combine multiple traits that support farm efficiency and acceptable yields but also contain genes associated with the production of toxins, allergens, and/or antinutritional compounds that were not considered during the selection process. Furthermore, existing cultivars frequently lack the functional genes required for specific sensory traits and the formation of health-promoting antioxidants. One new method efficiently addresses some of these issues by either silencing undesirable genes or enhancing the expression of genes that are linked to dormant beneficial traits. Rather than incorporating foreign DNA into the plant's genome, these methods transform crops with plant-derived transfer (P-) DNAs that consist of only native genetic elements. The genetic modification can be characterized molecularly so that any inadvertent transfer of undesirable DNA, as may be the case with traditional methods, is excluded. A recently developed intragenic potato plant is silenced for the polyphenol oxidase, dikinase R1, and phosphorylase-L genes in a tuber-specific manner. French fries derived from these tubers lack discolorations, display an enhanced potato flavor, and produce greatly reduced amounts of the suspected carcinogen acrylamide. It is argued that intragenic modification is unlikely to trigger phenotypic, biochemical, or physiological variation that is new to the species. Similarly, the targeted traits are similar to those that breeders select for and often have a history of domestication and reduced fitness. For these reasons, an updated regulatory system is proposed whereby intragenic crops are considered as low risk and should be cleared for commercial release in a timely and cost-effective manner. By using modern techniques to modify the same genetic material that is used by breeders, intragenic approaches may be perceived as an acceptable extension of traditional methods in crop improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488120     DOI: 10.1021/jf0706631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  7 in total

1.  Making the most of GM potatoes.

Authors:  Gerhart U Ryffel
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Backbone-free transformation of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula) with a Medicago-derived transfer DNA.

Authors:  Massimo Confalonieri; Roberto Borghetti; Anca Macovei; Claudia Testoni; Daniela Carbonera; Manuel Pedro Salema Fevereiro; Caius Rommens; Kathy Swords; Efisio Piano; Alma Balestrazzi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Transformation of apple (Malus × domestica) using mutants of apple acetolactate synthase as a selectable marker and analysis of the T-DNA integration sites.

Authors:  Jia-Long Yao; Sumathi Tomes; Andrew P Gleave
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  New Strategies to Overcome Present CRISPR/Cas9 Limitations in Apple and Pear: Efficient Dechimerization and Base Editing.

Authors:  Jaiana Malabarba; Elisabeth Chevreau; Nicolas Dousset; Florian Veillet; Julie Moizan; Emilie Vergne
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The Intragenesis and Synthetic Biology Approach towards Accelerating Genetic Gains on Strawberry: Development of New Tools to Improve Fruit Quality and Resistance to Pathogens.

Authors:  Victoria Súnico; José Javier Higuera; Francisco J Molina-Hidalgo; Rosario Blanco-Portales; Enriqueta Moyano; Antonio Rodríguez-Franco; Juan Muñoz-Blanco; José L Caballero
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-25

Review 6.  New Biotechnological Tools for the Genetic Improvement of Major Woody Fruit Species.

Authors:  Cecilia Limera; Silvia Sabbadini; Jeremy B Sweet; Bruno Mezzetti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Iron Biofortification of Staple Crops: Lessons and Challenges in Plant Genetics.

Authors:  James M Connorton; Janneke Balk
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.927

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.