Literature DB >> 17487515

Evaluation of the utility of homology models in high throughput docking.

Philippe Ferrara1, Edgar Jacoby.   

Abstract

High throughput docking (HTD) is routinely used for in silico screening of compound libraries with the aim to find novel leads in a drug discovery program. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, a homology model can be used instead. Here we present an assessment of the utility of homology models in HTD by docking 300,000 anticipated inactive compounds along with 642 known actives into the binding site of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) kinase constructed by homology modeling. Twenty-one different templates were selected and the enrichment curves obtained by the homology models were compared to those obtained by three IGF-1R crystal structures. The results show a wide range of enrichments from random to as good as two of the three IGF-1R crystal structures. Nevertheless, if we consider the enrichment obtained at 2% of the database screened as a performance criterion, the best crystal structure outperforms the best homology model. Surprisingly, the sequence identity of the template to the target is not a good descriptor to predict the enrichment obtained by a homology model. The three homology models that yield the worst enrichment have the smallest binding-site volume. Based on our results, we propose ensemble docking to perform HTD with homology models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17487515     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-007-0207-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  29 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins.

Authors:  P S Charifson; J J Corkery; M A Murcko; W P Walters
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  The protein kinase complement of the human genome.

Authors:  G Manning; D B Whyte; R Martinez; T Hunter; S Sudarsanam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Oncogenic kinase signalling.

Authors:  P Blume-Jensen; T Hunter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment.

Authors:  Marcel L Verdonk; Valerio Berdini; Michael J Hartshorn; Wijnand T M Mooij; Christopher W Murray; Richard D Taylor; Paul Watson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 May-Jun

6.  Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures.

Authors:  G J Kleywegt; T A Jones
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1994-03-01

Review 7.  Virtual screening for kinase targets.

Authors:  Ingo Muegge; Istvan J Enyedy
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures.

Authors:  Xavier Barril; S David Morley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Current therapies and emerging targets for the treatment of diabetes.

Authors:  A S Wagman; J M Nuss
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.116

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Homology modelling of the human adenosine A2B receptor based on X-ray structures of bovine rhodopsin, the beta2-adrenergic receptor and the human adenosine A2A receptor.

Authors:  Farag F Sherbiny; Anke C Schiedel; Astrid Maass; Christa E Müller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  What in silico molecular docking can do for the 'bench-working biologists'.

Authors:  Marius Mihăşan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.

Authors:  Ilaria Motto; Annalisa Bordogna; Anatoly A Soshilov; Michael S Denison; Laura Bonati
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Molecular modeling of the AhR structure and interactions can shed light on ligand-dependent activation and transformation mechanisms.

Authors:  Laura Bonati; Dario Corrada; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Stefano Motta
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 6.  Structure-based systems biology for analyzing off-target binding.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Li Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Modelling three-dimensional protein structures for applications in drug design.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Andreas Bergner; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.851

8.  Recombinant plasmepsin 1 from the human malaria parasite plasmodium falciparum: enzymatic characterization, active site inhibitor design, and structural analysis.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Melissa R Marzahn; Arthur H Robbins; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán; David Rodríguez; Scott H McClung; Stanley M Stevens; Charles A Yowell; John B Dame; Robert McKenna; Ben M Dunn
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.

Authors:  Peter J Huwe; Qifang Xu; Maxim V Shapovalov; Vivek Modi; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

10.  Molecular docking screens using comparative models of proteins.

Authors:  Hao Fan; John J Irwin; Benjamin M Webb; Gerhard Klebe; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.