Literature DB >> 12698149

Revised screening scale to predict survival after insertion of a left ventricular assist device.

Vivek Rao1, Mehmet C Oz, Margaret A Flannery, Katharine A Catanese, Michael Argenziano, Yoshifumi Naka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously calculated a risk factor summation score that successfully predicted survival after insertion of a left ventricular assist device. We sought to validate our previous score by using a single center's clinical experience and to determine emerging risk factors for mortality after device insertion.
METHODS: The clinical records of 130 consecutive patients who received the HeartMate VE left ventricular assist device (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) at our institution between June 1996 and March 2001 as a bridge to transplantation were reviewed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the predictors of operative mortality after device insertion. Using the relative risks for each identified variable, we devised a new risk factor summation score. The new and old scores were then compared by using linear regression analyses to determine whether the revised score improved statistical accuracy.
RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 25% (n = 33). The old score successfully predicted operative mortality in the current patient population (operative mortality of 38% for score >5 vs 13% for score < or =5). However, the revised score improved risk discrimination (operative mortality of 46% for a score >5 vs 12% for a score < or = to 5). Statistical accuracy was comparable between scores, but the relationship between observed and predicted outcomes was improved with the revised score.
CONCLUSIONS: The changing demographic profile and management of patients presenting for mechanical circulatory support has led to a change in the predictors of mortality after device insertion. Periodic remodeling and recalibration of risk indices helps to accurately predict outcomes in high-risk patient groups and identifies emerging risk factors for mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12698149     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2003.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  15 in total

1.  Importance of luxury flow for critically ill patients receiving a left ventricular assist system.

Authors:  Motonobu Nishimura; Takashi Nishimura; Masayuki Ishikawa; Ayumu Masuoka; Nobuyuki Okamura; Keiko Abe; Takahiro Matsuoka; Mika Iwazaki; Kazuhito Imanaka; Haruhiko Asano; Shunei Kyo
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Risk modeling for ventricular assist device support in post-cardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi; Vivek Rao; Augustine Tang; Manjula Maganti; Robert Cusimano
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-02-13

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Deborah J Kozik; Mark D Plunkett
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Early adverse events as predictors of 1-year mortality during mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Genovese; Mary Amanda Dew; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Marc A Simon; Jay K Bhama; Christian A Bermudez; Kathleen L Lockard; Steve Winowich; Robert L Kormos
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Managing drugs and devices in patients with permanent ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Martin Cadeiras; Manuel von Bayern; Mario C Deng
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

6.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Improving outcomes in patients with ventricular assist devices transferred from outlying to tertiary care hospitals.

Authors:  Mark B Anderson; Eric Gratz; Raymond K Wong; Karim Benali; Robert T V Kung
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-03

Review 8.  Mechanical support in acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Andreas Brieke; Joseph Cleveland; JoAnn Lindenfeld
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; William Hiesinger; Vivian M Hsu; Ryan C McCormick; Elliott D Kozin; Carine M Laporte; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; E Carter Paulson; Michael A Acker; Rohinton J Morris; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Left ventricular assist device patient selection: do risk scores help?

Authors:  Ashwin K Ravichandran; Jennifer Cowger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.