Literature DB >> 17486387

mFISH analysis of chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells collected from CBA/CaJ mice following whole body exposure to heavy ions (56Fe ions).

K Noy Rithidech1, L Honikel, E B Whorton.   

Abstract

To date, there is scant information on in vivo induction of chromosomal damage by heavy ions found in space (i.e. 56Fe ions). For radiation-induced response to be useful for risk assessment, it must be established in in vivo systems especially in cells that are known to be at risk for health problems associated with radiation exposure (such as hematopoietic cells, the known target tissue for radiation-induced leukemia). In this study, the whole genome multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) technique was used to examine the in vivo induction of chromosomal damage in hematopoietic tissues, i.e. bone marrow cells. These cells were collected from CBA/CaJ mice at day 7 following whole-body exposure to different doses of 1 GeV/amu 56Fe ions (0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 Gy) or (137)Cs gamma rays as the reference radiation (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 Gy, at the dose rate of 0.72 Gy/min using a GammaCell40). These radiation doses were the average total-body doses. For each radiation type, there were four mice per dose. Several types of aberrations in bone marrow cells collected from mice exposed to either type of radiation were found. These were exchanges and breaks (both chromatid- and chromosome-types). Chromosomal exchanges included translocations (Robertsonian or centric fusion, reciprocal and incomplete types), and dicentrics. No evidence of a non-random involvement of specific chromosomes in any type of aberrations observed in mice exposed to 56Fe ions or 137Cs gamma rays was found. At the radiation dose range used in our in vivo study, the majority of exchanges were simple. Complex exchanges were detected in bone marrow cells collected from mice exposed to 1 Gy of 56Fe ions or 3 Gy of 137Cs gamma rays only, but their frequencies were low. Overall, our in vivo data indicate that the frequency of complex chromosome exchanges was not significantly different between bone marrow cells collected from mice exposed to 56Fe ions or 137Cs gamma rays. Each type of radiation induced significant dose-dependent increases (ANOVA, P < 0.01) in the frequencies of chromosomal damage, including the numbers of abnormal cells. Based upon the linear-terms of dose-response curves, 56Fe ions were 1.6 (all types of exchanges), 4.3 (abnormal cells) and 4.2 (breaks, both chromatid- and chromosome-types) times more effective than 137Cs gamma rays in inducing chromosomal damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17486387     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-006-0092-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   2.017


  28 in total

1.  Clustered DNA damages induced by high and low LET radiation, including heavy ions.

Authors:  B M Sutherland; P V Bennett; H Schenk; O Sidorkina; J Laval; J Trunk; D Monteleone; J Sutherland
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  Persistence of chromosome aberrations in mice acutely exposed to 56Fe+26 ions.

Authors:  James D Tucker; Brian Marples; Marilyn J Ramsey; Louise H Lutze-Mann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Relationship between aberration yield and mitotic delay in human lymphocytes exposed to 200 MeV/u Fe-ions or X-rays.

Authors:  Sylvia Ritter; Elena Nasonova; Yoshiya Furusawa; Koichi Ando
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Induction of chromosome aberrations in human cells by charged particles.

Authors:  H Wu; M Durante; K George; T C Yang
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions); detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges.

Authors:  M Crocker; B M Cattanach
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1981 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Advantages of the CBA mouse in leukemogenesis research.

Authors:  K N Rithidech; E P Cronkite; V P Bond
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.

Authors:  D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; D L Preston; M Vaeth; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Space radiation cancer risks and uncertainties for Mars missions.

Authors:  F A Cucinotta; W Schimmerling; J W Wilson; L E Peterson; G D Badhwar; P B Saganti; J F Dicello
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 9.  Radiation burdens for humans on prolonged exomagnetospheric voyages.

Authors:  F D Moore
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A specific chromosomal deletion in murine leukemic cells induced by radiation with different qualities.

Authors:  K N Rithidech; V P Bond; E P Cronkite; M H Thompson
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  DNA Methylation in Radiation-Induced Carcinogenesis: Experimental Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Laura E Ewing; Kristy R Kutanzi; Robert J Griffin; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2018

2.  NF-κB-dependent DNA damage-signaling differentially regulates DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms in immature and mature human hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  D Kraft; M Rall; M Volcic; E Metzler; A Groo; A Stahl; L Bauer; E Nasonova; D Salles; G Taucher-Scholz; H Bönig; C Fournier; L Wiesmüller
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  No Evidence for the In Vivo Induction of Genomic Instability by Low Doses of CS Gamma Rays in Bone Marrow Cells of BALB/CJ and C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise M Honikel; Elbert B Whorton
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Identification of proteins secreted into the medium by human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with or without adaptive environments.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Xianyin Lai; Louise Honikel; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Detection of Inter-chromosomal Stable Aberrations by Multiple Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (mFISH) and Spectral Karyotyping (SKY) in Irradiated Mice.

Authors:  Rupak Pathak; Igor Koturbash; Martin Hauer-Jensen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Lack of genomic instability in bone marrow cells of SCID mice exposed whole-body to low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise Honikel; Elbert Whorton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  MMR Deficiency Does Not Sensitize or Compromise the Function of Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Low and High LET Radiation.

Authors:  Rutulkumar Patel; Yulan Qing; Lucy Kennedy; Yan Yan; John Pink; Brittany Aguila; Amar Desai; Stanton L Gerson; Scott M Welford
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 8.  Ionizing Particle Radiation as a Modulator of Endogenous Bone Marrow Cell Reprogramming: Implications for Hematological Cancers.

Authors:  Sujatha Muralidharan; Sharath P Sasi; Maria A Zuriaga; Karen K Hirschi; Christopher D Porada; Matthew A Coleman; Kenneth X Walsh; Xinhua Yan; David A Goukassian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.