Literature DB >> 17485978

The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player.

William E Hodgetts1, Jana M Rieger, Ryan A Szarko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of listening environment and earphone style on the preferred-listening levels (PLLs) measured in users' ear canals with a commercially-available MP3 player. It was hypothesized that listeners would prefer higher levels with earbud headphones as opposed to over-the-ear headphones, and that the effects would depend on the environment in which the user was listening. A secondary objective was to use the measured PLLs to determine the permissible listening duration to reach 100% daily noise dose.
DESIGN: There were two independent variables in this study. The first, headphone style, had three levels: earbud, over-the-ear, and over-the-ear with noise reduction (the same headphones with a noise reduction circuit). The second, environment, also had 3 levels: quiet, street noise and multi-talker babble. The dependent variable was ear canal A-weighted sound pressure level. A 3 x 3 within-subjects repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data. Thirty-eight normal hearing adults were recruited from the Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Alberta. Each subject listened to the same song and adjusted the level until it "sounded best" to them in each of the 9 conditions.
RESULTS: Significant main effects were found for both the headphone style and environment factors. On average, listeners had higher preferred listening levels with the earbud headphones, than with the over-the-ear headphones. When the noise reduction circuit was used with the over-the-ear headphones, the average PLL was even lower. On average, listeners had higher PLLs in street noise than in multi-talker babble and both of these were higher than the PLL for the quiet condition. The interaction between headphone style and environment was also significant. Details of individual contrasts are explored. Overall, PLLs were quite conservative, which would theoretically allow for extended permissible listening durations. Finally, we investigated the maximum output level of the MP3 player in the ear canals of authors 1 and 3 of this paper. Levels were highest with the earbud style, followed by the over-the-ear with noise reduction. The over-the-ear headphone without noise reduction had the lowest maximum output.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of MP3 players are sold with the earbud style of headphones. Preferred listening levels are higher with this style of headphone compared to the over-the-ear style. Moreover, as the noise level in the environment increases, earbud users are even more susceptible to background noise and consequently increase the level of the music to overcome this. The result is an increased sound pressure level at the eardrum. However, the levels chosen by our subjects suggest that MP3 listening levels may not be as significant a concern as has been reported recently in the mainstream media.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485978     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  23 in total

1.  Comparing two methods to measure preferred listening levels of personal listening devices.

Authors:  Darrin A Worthington; Jonathan H Siegel; Laura Ann Wilber; Benjamin M Faber; Kathleen T Dunckley; Dean C Garstecki; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Shawna Dell; Brittany Hensley; James W Hall; Kathleen C M Campbell; Patrick J Antonelli; Glenn E Green; James M Miller; Kenneth Guire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Noise-induced hearing loss in children: A 'less than silent' environmental danger.

Authors:  Robert V Harrison
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Christopher Spankovich; Edward Lobariñas; Scott K Griffiths
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Real-ear acoustical characteristics of impulse sound generated by golf drivers and the estimated risk to hearing: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fei Zhao; Barry Bardsley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Analysis of Factors Affecting Output Levels and Frequencies of MP3 Players.

Authors:  Jinsook Kim
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2013-09-24

7.  Music listening behavior, health, hearing and otoacoustic emission levels.

Authors:  Kathleen Hutchinson Marron; Brittany Sproat; Danielle Ross; Sarah Wagner; Helaine Alessio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effect of personal music system use on sacculocollic reflex assessed by cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Niraj Kumar Singh; Chithra Sobha Sasidharan
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Noise exposure and hearing impairment among Chinese restaurant workers and entertainment employees in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Xiang Qian Lao; Ignatius Tak Sun Yu; Dennis Kin Kwok Au; Yuk Lan Chiu; Claudie Chiu Yi Wong; Tze Wai Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The prevention of noise induced hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Robert V Harrison
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.