Urogenital infections of bacterial origin have a high incidence among the world female population at reproductive age. Lactobacilli, the predominant microorganisms of the healthy vaginal microbiota, have shown a protective effect against the colonization and overgrowth of urogenital pathogens that increased the interest for including them into probiotics products assigned to restore the urogenital balance. In the present work, we determined in a mouse animal model the capability of Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289, a human vaginal strain with probiotic properties, to prevent the vaginal colonization of a uropathogenic strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Six-week-old female BALB/c mice, synchronized in their estral cycle, were intravaginally inoculated with two doses of 10(9) lactobacilli before challenging them with a single dose of 10(5) or 10(7) CFU of S. aureus. The vaginal colonization of both microorganisms and the effect on the vaginal structure were determined at 2, 5, and 7 days after pathogen inoculation. Control mice and those challenged only with the pathogen showed an insignificant lactobacilli population, whereas 10(5) lactobacilli/mL of vaginal homogenate were recovered at 2 days after challenge from the L. paracasei CRL 1289 and the probiotic + pathogen groups, decreasing this number on the following days. The treatment with L. paracasei CRL 1289 decreased significantly the number of staphylococci recovered at 2 and 5 days when mice were challenged only with 10(5) CFU of pathogen. The inoculation of S. aureus produced a remarkable inflammatory response and structural alterations in the vaginal mucosa that decreases in a significant manner when the mice were protected with L. paracasei CRL 1289. The results obtained suggest that this particular Lactobacillus strain could prevent the onset of urogenital infections by interfering with the epithelial colonization by uropathogenic S. aureus.
Urogenital infections of bacterial origin have a high incidence among the world female population at reproductive age. Lactobacilli, the predominant microorganisms of the healthy vaginal microbiota, have shown a protective effect against the colonization and overgrowth of urogenital pathogens that increased the interest for including them into probiotics products assigned to restore the urogenital balance. In the present work, we determined in a mouse animal model the capability of Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289, a human vaginal strain with probiotic properties, to prevent the vaginal colonization of a uropathogenic strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Six-week-old female BALB/c mice, synchronized in their estral cycle, were intravaginally inoculated with two doses of 10(9) lactobacilli before challenging them with a single dose of 10(5) or 10(7) CFU of S. aureus. The vaginal colonization of both microorganisms and the effect on the vaginal structure were determined at 2, 5, and 7 days after pathogen inoculation. Control mice and those challenged only with the pathogen showed an insignificant lactobacilli population, whereas 10(5) lactobacilli/mL of vaginal homogenate were recovered at 2 days after challenge from the L. paracasei CRL 1289 and the probiotic + pathogen groups, decreasing this number on the following days. The treatment with L. paracasei CRL 1289 decreased significantly the number of staphylococci recovered at 2 and 5 days when mice were challenged only with 10(5) CFU of pathogen. The inoculation of S. aureus produced a remarkable inflammatory response and structural alterations in the vaginal mucosa that decreases in a significant manner when the mice were protected with L. paracasei CRL 1289. The results obtained suggest that this particular Lactobacillus strain could prevent the onset of urogenital infections by interfering with the epithelial colonization by uropathogenic S. aureus.
Urogenital tract infections of bacterial origin have a high
incidence among the world female population at reproductive age. A
great proportion of these diseases, such as vaginosis and urinary
tract infections are often caused by pathogens that emerge from
the intestinal microbiota and ascend along perineum to the vagina
and then to the urethra and bladder [1]. While antibiotics
have been extensively used as a quite effective therapy for the
treatment of these bacterial infections, the increasing drug
resistance of urogenital pathogens makes imperative the
development of alternative therapeutics.In healthy women, the vaginal microflora is dominated by
Lactobacillus species, at a level of
107-108 CFU g−1 of fluid, which exert a
significant influence on the microbiology of the ecosystem
[2]. It has been observed that indigenous lactobacilli
prevent the overgrowth and invasion of pathogenic bacteria
[3] by a combination of competitive exclusion, competition for nutrients, and release of antimicrobial substances such as
hydrogen peroxide, organic acids, bacteriocins, and biosurfactants
[3-6]. In consequence, a depletion of vaginal lactobacilli has been directly associated with an increase in the incidence of genital and urinary infections [7-9]. For this
reason, there is a growing interest in the use of human
lactobacilli as probiotics that restore and maintain a normal
vaginal flora and prevent disease recurrence by forming a pellicle
on the vaginal epithelium as a biological barrier against
colonization of pathogenic bacteria. In this sense, previous
studies have reported that adhesive lactobacilli can inhibit in
vitro the attachment of pathogens such as Escherichia
coli, Gardnerella vaginalis, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and
Streptococcus agalactiae to urogenital epithelial cells
[5, 10–13].Having in mind the objective of developing a probiotic formulation
for the prevention and therapy of urogenital tract infections, our
research group has previously isolated and identified vaginal
lactobacilli from healthy women of Tucumán city in Argentina
[14]. The strains were extensively characterized for their probiotic and technological features and some promising properties
such as adhesion, auto and coaggregation abilities, hydrogen
peroxide, bacteriocin-like substances, and organic acids
production were reported [15-18]. Relevant technological properties, for instance, the optimal conditions for the production of antimicrobial substances and the viability and
biological properties after processing, were also determined for
selected strains [19-24].Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289 is a selected human
vaginal strain selected by its probiotic potential, since it is
able to inhibit the growth of uropathogenic Staphylococcus
aureus in vitro by release of H [20], and its adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells by exclusion and competence for specific receptors [24]. Staphylococcus aureus is a major opportunistic pathogen that can cause a variety of local and systemic infections ranging from skin abscesses, bone and soft tissue surgical infections,
sepsis, invasive endocarditis, and toxic shock syndrome (TSS)
[25]. TSS is a geographically widespread disease affecting mainly young healthy menstruating women, especially those using
tampons [26].The aim of the present work was to determine, in a mouse animal
model, the capability of Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289
to prevent the vaginal colonization of uropathogenic
Staphylococcus aureus.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Microorganisms and growth conditions
Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289 was originally
isolated from vaginal smears of healthy women [14] and was previously characterized by their probiotic and technological
properties [15, 20, 22–24]. The human uropathogenic strain
of Staphylococcus aureus used in this study was kindly
provided by the Institute of Microbiology “LuisVerna” of the
University of Tucumán, Argentina, and was isolated from
pathological urine. Before experimental use, each strain stored in
milk-yeast extract at −20°C was propagated in LAPTg broth
(1.5% peptone, 1% tryptone, 1% glucose, 1% yeast extract, and 0.1% Tween 80, pH 6.8) [27] at 37°C and subcultured at least twice in this media every 12 hours. Lactobacilli were cultivated under static conditions in order to avoid the
detrimental effects of oxygen whereas staphylococci were incubated
with shaking at 100 rpm.
2.2. Animals
Six-week-old female BALB/c mice from the inbreed colony of CERELA
(Centro de Referencia para Lacobacilos), each weighing
from 25 to 30 g, were used throughout the investigation.
Animals were housed in plastic cages and fed ad libitum with a
conventional balanced diet, keeping their environmental conditions
constant. All the animals were synchronized in their estrous cycle
with an intramuscular single dose of 0.5 mg of estradiol
valerate (Progynon Depot. Schering Laboratories) and randomly
assigned to the following experimental groups: (1) lactobacilli
treated group, (2) lactobacilli + pathogen treated group, and (3)
pathogen treated group. Five animals were used as control
synchronized nontreated group. The CERELA Committee of Ethics
approved the protocol used for animal studies.
2.3. Microorganisms inoculation procedure
A spontaneous rifampicin resistant strain obtained by plating
L. paracasei CRL 1289 on Rogosa agar (Merck) supplemented
with 150 μg/mL of rifampicin was used to inoculate mice.
The resistant strain showed exactly the same properties
of the original strain. Overnight cultures of
lactobacilli and staphylococci grown on Laptg broth (12 hours,
37°C) were centrifuged (10 000 g, 10 minutes,
4°C), washed twice with sterile saline solution, and
incorporated into glycogelatin ovules at a concentration of
109 CFU of lactobacilli and 105 and 107 CFU of
S. aureus per each ovule. The base preparation of the
ovules was obtained by mixing 21% gelatin and 58% glycerol in
distilled water. This matrix was sterilized at 121°C for
15 minutes, and supplemented with 0.5% ascorbic acid and the
suspensions of microorganisms in a proportion 1 : 5. Forty-eight
hours after estradiol synchronization, animals of groups 1 and 2
were intravaginally inoculated with two doses of 109
lactobacilli (with a 24-hour interval between each other).
On the third day, the animals of group 2 and those
belonging to group 3 were challenged with a single dose of
105 or 107 CFU of uropathogenic S. aureus.
Figure 1 shows the inoculation protocol used.
Figure 1
Scheme of inoculation of L. paracasei CRL 1289
and Staphylococcus aureus on Balb/c mice. H: hormone
(estradiol valerate), L: lactobacilli inoculation, P: pathogen inoculation, L + P: lactobacilli plus pathogen inoculation, S: sacrifice of animals, and Gg: glycogelatin ovules without microorganisms.
2.4. Bacterial counts in vaginal homogenates
At 2, 5, and 7 days after pathogen inoculation, the animals were
sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The vagina of each animal was
removed aseptically, placed in 0.5% peptone-water, and
homogenized with a Teflon pestle. Serial ten-fold dilutions from
this homogenate were plated on Rogosa agar (LBS, Merck); Rogosa
agar supplemented with 150 μg/mL of rifampicin and Manitol
Salt Agar (MSA, Britania) for counts of lactic acid bacteria,
L. paracasei CRL 1289, and S. aureus,
respectively. The LBS plates were incubated 72 hours under
microaerophilic conditions whereas MSA plates were aerobically
incubated.
2.5. Cytological and histological studies
The cytological and histological evaluations were
carried out by light microscopy. For cytological studies,
50 μL of vaginal exudates were collected with a
micropipette tip, spread onto glass slides, and stained with
Giemsa. For the study of histological structures, the
vaginas were aseptically removed, fixed with 10% paraformaldehyde
for 24 hours at room temperature, and then embedded in paraffin
according to standard histological methods [28].
Serial paraffin sections of 4 μm were stained with
hematoxylin-eosin and observed at 40X.
2.6. Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean value ± standard
deviation of the data obtained from three animals at each sample
time of two independent experiments. Significant differences
between means were determined by Tukey's test after analysis of
variance (ANOVA) with Minitab Statistic Program, release 12 for
Windows. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically
significant.
3. RESULTS
Figure 2(a) shows the viable counts
of lactobacilli and Figure 2(b) those
of staphylococci on the vaginal homogenates of Balb/c mice at
different sampling times after inoculation of probiotic
L. paracasei CRL 1289 and uropathogenic S. aureus.
Synchronized nontreated mice and those challenged only with the
pathogen (Group 3) showed an insignificant lactobacilli
population. On the other side, 105 lactobacilli/mL of vaginal
homogenate were recovered from the group inoculated only with
probiotic L. paracasei CRL 1289 (Group 1) and the
probiotic + pathogen group (Group 2) at 2 days after challenge.
However, this number decreased progressively on the following days
(see Figure 2(a)).
Figure 2
Viable counts of lactobacilli (panel A) and staphylococci
(panel B) on the vagina of mice inoculated only with these
microorganisms or pretreated with L. paracasei CRL 1289 and
challenged with uropathogenic S. aureus. Panel A: ()
L. paracasei CRL 1289 inoculated, () lactobacilli counted at 2 days after inoculation; () lactobacilli counted at 5 days; () lactobacilli counted at 7 days. Panel B: () S. aureus inoculated; () staphylococci counted at 2 days; () staphylococci counted at 5 days; () staphylococci counted at 7 days after inoculation.
Referred to the number of pathogens recovered from mice, control
group and the lactobacilli treated group (Group 1) were almost
depleted of staphylococci population (Figure 2(b)).
The inoculation of 107 CFU of S. aureus produced a
high and constant colonization of the pathogen that was not
prevented by the pretreatment with lactobacilli (results not
shown). However, the treatment with L. paracasei CRL 1289
previous to the pathogen infection decreased significantly the
number of staphylococci recovered at 2 and 5 days when mice were
challenged with 105 CFU of the pathogen
(Figure 2(b)).Figure 3 shows the vaginal smears stained with Giemsa
of mice inoculated with lactobacilli and staphylococci. No
cytological modifications were observed after the administration
of L. paracasei CRL 1289. By the contrary, the
inoculation of S. aureus produced a remarkable
inflammatory response (Group 3) with a high infiltration of
polymorphonuclear cells in the vaginal secretions. This effect
decreased in a significant manner when mice were previously
protected with L. paracasei CRL 1289.
Figure 3
Vaginal smears stained with Giemsa of mice that were
inoculated with lactobacilli and/or staphylococci. (a) Lactobacilli treated group; (b), (c) lactobacilli + pathogen treated group; (d) pathogen treated group. Magnification is 40X.
No histological alterations were produced by the lactobacilli
inoculation (Figure 4), whereas significant structural
modifications of the vaginal mucosa, with disappearance of the
keratin layer and neutrophiles infiltration in the epithelium,
were observed in the group inoculated solely with
S. aureus (Figure 4). An intermediate effect was
observed in mice protected with L. paracasei CRL 1289.
Figure 4
Light microscopy photographs of histological slices
stained with hematoxylin-eosin showing the mucosa structure of the
vaginas of mice that were inoculated with lactobacilli and/or
staphylococci. (a), (b) Lactobacilli treated groups at 10X and
100X, respectively. (c), (d) Lactobacilli + pathogen treated groups
at 40X and 100X. (e), (f) Pathogen treated groups at 40X and 100X
magnifications, respectively. For details see Materials and Methods.
4. DISCUSSION
The potential use of human lactobacilli as probiotics assigned to
restore and maintain a healthy urogenital tract represents a
promising alternative to conventional chemotherapy
[6, 29]. At present, a lot of scientific evidence supports, by in vitro and in vivo studies, the effectiveness of probiotics to prevent the attachment or stimulate the removal of enteropathogens from intestinal cells [30, 31]. Probiotics have been
successfully used to prevent and treat gastrointestinal diseases
caused by antibiotics treatments, rotavirus, enterobacteria and
clostridia infections [32]. However, there are much lesser antecedents on the preventive and therapeutic effects of
probiotics against diseases of the urogenital tract. Some in vitro
studies have reported the inhibition of pathogens growth and
adherence to uroepithelial cells by lactobacilli
[10, 12, 13, 21, 24, 33]. This “anti-infective” mechanism involves the release of antimicrobials and the blockage of uropathogens adherence by both steric hindrance and
competition for receptors [10, 34]. With respect to in vivo studies, it has been reported that vaginal lactobacilli prevented urinary tract colonization of mice by E. coli but were
not able to exert significant therapeutic effects [35]. In humans, clinical efficacy for urogenital health maintenance and
disease prevention has been demonstrated only for
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and
Lactobacillus reuteriRC-14 [1]. Both probiotic lactobacilli strains colonized the urogenital tract by vaginal instillation
and oral consumption, and were able to reduce the risk of UTI and
cure bacterial vaginosis [36, 37].In the healthy urogenital tract of adult females, it is supposed
that the indigenous lactobacilli exclude the colonization of
pathogenic bacteria by antagonistic compounds and/or by
occupying/masking their potential binding sites in the mucosa
[10, 38]. However, in a depleted lactobacilli environment such
as an infected urogenital tract, it should be expected that
exogenous probiotic lactobacilli have the capacity to compete for
the same receptors and displace previously attached pathogens
[11]. In a previous study, we observed that selected vaginal lactobacilli interfered to different extents with the growth and
adherence to vaginal epithelial cells of some genitourinary
pathogens [21, 24]. Among these strains, Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289 was able to decrease, in a significant level, the adhesion of S. aureus by exclusion and competition mechanisms [24], as well as to inhibit its growth by H production [15, 20]. Based on these findings, we evaluated in the present work the ability of these
lactobacilli to prevent the vaginal colonization of
S. aureus in an animal model, and the protection achieved.The results obtained showed that lactobacilli were not a dominant
population of the vaginal microbiota of the Balb/c mice used in
this study and that humanLactobacillus paracasei CRL
1289 was able to colonize transiently the murine vaginal tract,
since 105 lactobacilli/mL of vaginal homogenate were
recovered after 2 days of inoculation but decreased progressively
on the following days. However, the humanS. aureus
uropathogenic strain was able to produce a very strong infection
when inoculated at 105 or 107 CFU levels, producing
significant morphological alterations of the mucosal structure,
mainly the infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells that appeared
as capsulated groups of cells in the vaginal epithelium and lamina
propia; and the complete disappearance of the keratin layer.
Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 1289 was not able to protect
mice challenged with 107 CFU of S. aureus but
effectively decreased the number of staphylococci in the vagina
and the damage caused, when the infecting dose of the pathogen was
105 CFU.In conclusion, the preliminary results obtained in this work
suggest that L. paracasei CRL 1289 could prevent the
onset of urogenital infections caused by uropathogenic
S. aureus interfering with the epithelial colonization (possibly
through barrier/interference mechanisms) and encourage further in
vivo studies, such as clinical trials designed to test their
capacity to prevent and manage urogenital tract infections in
females.
Authors: Virginia S. Ocana; Elena Bru; Aída A. P. De Ruiz Holgado; María Elena Nader-Macias Journal: J Gen Appl Microbiol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 1.452
Authors: Bernice Huang; Jennifer M Fettweis; J Paul Brooks; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gregory A Buck Journal: Clin Lab Med Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 1.935
Authors: William A Rose; Chris L McGowin; Rae Ann Spagnuolo; Tonyia D Eaves-Pyles; Vsevolod L Popov; Richard B Pyles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marija Miljkovic; Ivana Strahinic; Maja Tolinacki; Milica Zivkovic; Snezana Kojic; Natasa Golic; Milan Kojic Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander N Dabrowski; Anshu Shrivastav; Claudia Conrad; Kassandra Komma; Markus Weigel; Kristina Dietert; Achim D Gruber; Wilhelm Bertrams; Jochen Wilhelm; Bernd Schmeck; Katrin Reppe; Philippe D N'Guessan; Sahar Aly; Norbert Suttorp; Torsten Hain; Janine Zahlten Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: D Elizabeth O'Hanlon; Pawel Gajer; Rebecca M Brotman; Jacques Ravel Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.293