| Literature DB >> 22611454 |
Liudmyla Lazarenko, Lidiia Babenko, Liubov Shynkarenko Sichel, Valentyn Pidgorskyi, Viktoriia Mokrozub, Olga Voronkova, Mykola Spivak.
Abstract
The antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, Bifidobacterium longum VK1, and B. bifidum VK2 strains or their various compositions in relation to Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and on models of experimental intravaginal staphylococcosis of mice was determined. It was found that under the influence of these strains and their various compositions, the in vitro growth of Staph. aureus was inhibited, and the number of colonies of Staph. aureus plated from the vagina of infected mice was significantly reduced. The antibacterial activity of these strains separately and in compositions correlated with their ability to improve the performance of the immune response. These strains were the most effective in the following compositions: Lact. casei IMV B-7280-B. longum VK1-B. bifidum VK2. Strains of Lact. casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. bifidum VK2, and B. longum VK1 are prospective components of future probiotic drugs efficient in treating staphylococcosis and for immunity correction.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22611454 PMCID: PMC3338002 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-012-9093-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins ISSN: 1867-1306 Impact factor: 4.609
Antagonistic activity of Lact. casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. longum VK1, and B. bifidum VK2 in relation to S. aureus in vitro
| Test-culture | Area of growth retardation, mm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 22.0 ± 1.3 | 16.0 ± 0.9 | 17.0 ± 1.1 | 16.0 ± 1.0 |
|
| 14.0 ± 2.1 | 21.0 ± 1.7 | 31.0 ± 1.2 | 5.0 ± 0.8 |
|
| 36.0 ± 1.9 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 24.0 ± 2.1 | 11.0 ± 2.4 |
|
| 34.0 ± 2.0 | 42.0 ± 1.3 | 39.0 ± 1.5 | 20.0 ± 1.2 |
Fig. 1Number of colonies of Staph. aureus 8325-4, which was sowed from the vagina of the infected mice after receiving intravaginal injection of probiotic strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, each of them separately
Fig. 2Number of colonies of Staph. aureus 8325-4, which was sowed from the vagina of the infected mice after receiving intravaginal injection of compositions of two probiotic strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, each of them separately
Fig. 3Number of colonies of Staph. aureus 8325-4, which was sowed from the vagina of the infected mice after receiving intravaginal injection of compositions of three or four probiotic strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, each of them separately
Numbers of T-, B-lymphocytes in the spleens of mice receiving injections of Lact. casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. longum VK1, or B. bifidum VK2 separately
| Groups of mice/time of observation, day | Relative number of cells, % | CD4/CD8, nominal units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD19+ | ||
| Intact | 61.9 ± 2.5 | 38.6 ± 1.3 | 26.3 ± 4.9 | 7.1 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Infected | |||||
| First day | 63.8 ± 1.3 | 38.6 ± 0.4 | 22.8 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.5 |
| Third day | 53.3 ± 0.7* | 29.5 ± 0.5* | 27.1 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 0.1* |
| Sixth day | 56.3 ± 3.2 | 37.5 ± 0.7 | 23.6 ± 2.3 | 15.3 ± 1.6* | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| Ninth day | 56.6 ± 8.5 | 36.9 ± 2.5 | 24.1 ± 2.2 | 9.6 ± 2.7 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 53.3 ± 2.5* | 34,0 ± 2.1 | 22.1 ± 5.3 | 11.3 ± 1.0* | 1.6 ± 0.7 |
| Third day | 52.3 ± 1.3* | 32.1 ± 1.2* | 21.1 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 1.7 | 1.5 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 56.4 ± 4.1 | 35.0 ± 1.4 | 23.5 ± 0.7 | 10.1 ± 1.1 | 1.5 ± 0.4 |
| Ninth day | 60.5 ± 2.0 | 40.1 ± 0.1 | 26.3 ± 0.2 | 9.9 ± 2.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 59.5 ± 3.8 | 35.0 ± 3.6 | 17.7 ± 4.5 | 8.7 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 |
| Third day | 58.0 ± 0.8• | 38.3 ± 0.5• | 25.7 ± 0.5 | 8.5 ± 1.9 | 1.5 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 59.8 ± 3.6 | 39.2 ± 3.7 | 23,9 ± 0,3 | 7.2 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.5 |
| Ninth day | 59.3 ± 2.9 | 38.2 ± 3.3 | 21.1 ± 4.0 | 8.3 ± 2.2 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 55.0 ± 1.9 | 33.0 ± 5.9 | 21.4 ± 3.0 | 12.1 ± 0,9* | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| Third day | 56.8 ± 2.9 | 38.9 ± 1.1• | 17.0 ± 4.1 | 5.0 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.2*• |
| Sixth day | 55.9 ± 3.7 | 32.8 ± 3.0 | 23.4 ±3.5 | 6.7 ± 1.0 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| Ninth day | 62.9 ± 5.9 | 41.3 ± 3.8 | 26.0 ± 1.0 | 6.0 ± 2.9 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 61.9 ± 3.9 | 40.5 ± 1.5 | 21.0 ± 2.2 | 11.2 ± 1.7* | 1.9 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 54.1 ± 1.8* | 32.6 ± 0.9* | 22.3 ± 1.9 | 6.8 ± 3.9 | 1.5 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 58.8 ± 2.2 | 40.3 ± 5.0 | 21.5 ± 4.0 | 10.4 ± 1.5 | 1.9 ± 0.4 |
| Ninth day | 55.0 ± 6.1 | 33.2 ± 4.1 | 21.4 ± 3.9 | 13.3 ± 1.1* | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
Significant differences with the control is represented by * (P < 0.05) while differences with the indicators of the infected mice who did not receive probiotic strains or their compositions are represented by • (P < 0.05)
Numbers of T-, B-lymphocytes in the spleens of mice who received compositions of two strains of Lact. casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. longum VK1, or B. bifidum VK2
| Groups of mice/time of observation, day | Relative number of cells, % | CD4/CD8, nominal units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD19+ | ||
| Intact | 61.9 ± 2.5 | 38.6 ± 1.3 | 26.3 ± 4.9 | 7.1 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Infected | |||||
| First day | 63.8 ± 1.3 | 38.6 ± 0.4 | 22.8 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.4 |
| Third day | 53.3 ± 0.7* | 29.5 ± 0.5* | 27.1 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| Sixth day | 56.3 ± 3.2 | 37.5 ± 0.7 | 23.6 ± 2.3 | 15.3 ± 1.6* | 1.6 ± 0.5 |
| Ninth day | 56.6 ± 2.5 | 36.9 ±.,5 | 24.1 ± 2.2 | 9.6 ± 2.7 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 61.9 ± 0.9 | 40.2 ± 4.5 | 21.7 ± 3.5 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.4 |
| Third day | 61.6 ± 1.0• | 38.2 ± 1.1• | 23.0 ± 2.4 | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 1.7 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 55.1 ± 9.5 | 34.0 ± 2.9 | 16.9 ± 5.1 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.1•* |
| Ninth day | 55.0 ± 5.1 | 38.2 ± 3.8 | 16.4 ± 3.4 | 6.0 ± 3.4 | 2.3 ± 0.2•* |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 62.2 ± 3.0 | 32.4 ± 2.6 | 19.2 ± 2.9 | 10.1 ± 5.1 | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| Third day | 59.3 ± 1.5• | 36.7 ± 1.0• | 19.6 ± 6.1 | 12.0 ± 1.0* | 1.9 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 57.0 ± 1.3 | 37.0 ± 2.8 | 24.6 ± 3.1 | 9.4 ± 2.1 | 1.5 ± 0.4 |
| Ninth day | 55.0 ± 2.9 | 37.1 ± 3.0 | 22.5 ± 7.5 | 12.4 ± 1.5* | 1.6 ± 0.5 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 55.1 ± 4.1 | 34.9 ± 4.2 | 21.6 ± 4.0 | 9.0 ± 4.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| Third day | 59.2 ± 0.5• | 37.6 ± 3.1• | 23.4 ± 3.1 | 10.1 ± 6.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 64.6 ± 2.5 | 41.9 ± 4.0 | 24.4 ± 4.2 | 14.6 ± 1.0* | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| Ninth day | 61.3 ± 2.0 | 38.0 ± 2.4 | 26.4 ± 3.2 | 10.6 ± 4.6 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 57.1 ± 4.1 | 39.0 ± 4.9 | 24.1 ± 5.1 | 13.7 ± 3.5* | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| Third day | 51.9 ± 1.5* | 30.4 ± 1.2* | 22.2 ± 3.1 | 6.3 ± 2.9 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Sixth day | 56.5 ± 4.1 | 35.0 ± 3.5 | 20.8 ± 7.2 | 10.4 ± 2.2 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| Ninth day | 57.0 ± 3.0 | 36.3 ± 5.6 | 20.4 ± 4.1 | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 50.1 ± 1.5* | 31.8 ± 2.1* | 18.6 ± 5.1 | 9.9 ± 2.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 53.0 ± 2.1* | 31.0 ± 2.0* | 18.0 ± 4.6 | 11.3 ± 2.1* | 1.7 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 60.5 ± 3.5 | 35.7 ± 3.1 | 24.0 ± 3.5 | 7.5 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
| Ninth day | 61.3 ± 2.0 | 38.0 ± 2.7 | 26.4 ± 1.5 | 10.6 ± 2.0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
Significant differences with the control is represented by * (P < 0.05), while differences with the indicators of the infected mice who did not receive probiotic strains or their compositions are represented by • (P < 0.05)
Numbers of T-, B-lymphocytes in the spleens of mice who received compositions of three or four strains of Lact. casei IMV B-7280, Lact. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. longum VK1, or B. bifidum VK2
| Groups of mice/time of observation, day | Relative number of cells, % | CD4/CD8, arbitrary units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD19+ | ||
| Intact | 61.9 ± 2.5 | 38.6 ± 1.3 | 26.3 ± 4.9 | 7.1 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Infected | |||||
| First day | 63.8 ± 1.3 | 38.6 ± 0,4 | 22.8 ± 0,1 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 53.3 ± 0,7* | 29.5 ± 0.5* | 27.1 ± 0,5 | 10.5 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| Sixth day | 56.3 ± 3.2 | 37.5 ± 0.7 | 23.6 ± 2,3 | 15.3 ± 1.6* | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 56.6 ± 8.5 | 36.9 ± 2.5 | 24.1 ± 2,2 | 9.6 ± 2.7 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 51.2 ± 2.9 | 38.9 ± 1.7 | 19.6 ± 4.7 | 8.7 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 0.1* |
| Third day | 54.1 ± 1.3* | 36.0 ± 0.5• | 21.5 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 1.7 | 1.7 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 57.0 ± 2.7 | 40.8 ± 2.7 | 28.1 ± 2.0 | 10.3 ± 0.9 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 56.0 ± 3.1 | 37.8 ± 1.0 | 28.6 ± 3.2 | 11.7 ± 1.1* | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 55.1 ± 1.6 | 32.7 ± 2.1 | 23.1 ± 4.0 | 18.3 ± 1.7* | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 58.0 ± 1.4• | 40.2 ± 1.0• | 26.4 ± 2.4 | 11.5 ± 0.9* | 1.5 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 57.0 ± 3.9 | 34.0 ± 2.7 | 22.9 ± 1.7 | 15.2 ± 1.7* | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 58.9 ± 2.1 | 37.6 ± 3.3 | 26.5 ± 2.0 | 9.0 ± 2.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 54.6 ± 3.2 | 38.3 ± 5.7 | 18.2 ± 3.1 | 6.3 ± 1.4 | 2.1 ± 0.1* |
| Third day | 63.0 ± 0.7• | 36.0 ± 1.1• | 27.8 ± 4.0 | 10.0 ± 3.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
| Sixth day | 55.0 ± 2.9 | 37.3 ± 3.4 | 23.4 ± 2.9 | 8.1 ± 2.7 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 54.8 ± 3.1 | 35.5 ± 2.2 | 19.1 ± 3.7 | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 57.3 ± 3.2 | 38.9 ± 3.0 | 23.8 ± 2.8 | 8.1 ± 2.3 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 53.0 ± 2.6* | 35.4 ± 0.9• | 18.8 ± 4.9 | 13.1 ± 1.1* | 1.9 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 60.3 ± 1.3 | 40.1 ± 2.4 | 26.2 ± 5.0 | 8.9 ± 2.4 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 61.1 ± 3.5 | 41.7 ± 1.8 | 24.1 ± 2.9 | 7.7 ± 2.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| Received | |||||
| First day | 55.5 ± 1.7 | 37.3 ± 4.0 | 24.4 ± 4.7 | 16.7 ± 3.8* | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Third day | 59.4 ± 1.0• | 41.6 ± 1.3• | 24.3 ± 1.8 | 11.7 ± 0.9* | 1.7 ± 0.1• |
| Sixth day | 56.1 ± 3.5 | 35.0 ± 2.7 | 23.6 ± 2.5 | 18.3 ± 1.1* | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| Ninth day | 58.9 ± 2.9 | 39.3 ± 3.1 | 27.2 ± 2.0 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
Significant differences with the control is represented by * (P < 0.05), while differences with the indicators of the infected mice who did not receive probiotic strains or their compositions are represented by • (P < 0.05)