Literature DB >> 17485669

Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison.

Peter A Hambäck1, Keith S Summerville, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Jochen Krauss, Göran Englund, Thomas O Crist.   

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation may strongly affect species density, species interactions, and the rate of ecosystem processes. It is therefore important to understand the observed variability among species responses to fragmentation and the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we compare density-area relationships (DARs) for 344 lepidopteran species belonging to 22 families (butterflies and moths). This analysis suggested that the DAR(slope) is generally positive for moths and negative for butterflies. The differences are suggested to occur because moths are largely olfactory searchers, whereas most butterflies are visual searchers. The analysis also suggests that DARs vary as a function of habitat specialization and body size. In butterflies, generalist species had a more negative DAR(slope) than specialist species because of a lower patch size threshold. In moths, the differences in DAR(slope) between forest and open habitat species were large for small species but absent for large species. This difference is argued to occur because the DAR(slope) in large species mainly reflects their search mode, which does not necessarily vary between moth groups, whereas the slope in small species reflects population growth rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485669      PMCID: PMC1895956          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611462104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes.

Authors:  N J Vickers
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  C D Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation.

Authors:  Jochen Krauss; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-01

5.  Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data.

Authors:  Göran Englund; Peter A Hambäck
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach.

Authors:  R K Didham; J Ghazoul; N E Stork; A J Davis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Nocturnality and species survival.

Authors:  G C Daily; P R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The analysis of olfactory communication among animals.

Authors:  W H Bossert; E O Wilson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 2.691

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands.

Authors:  Juha Pöyry; Juho Paukkunen; Janne Heliölä; Mikko Kuussaari
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Insect density-plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations.

Authors:  Petter Andersson; Christer Löfstedt; Peter A Hambäck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Population densities and density-area relationships in a community with advective dispersal and variable mosaics of resource patches.

Authors:  Jill Lancaster; Barbara J Downes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Cross-species pathogen spillover across ecosystem boundaries: mechanisms and theory.

Authors:  Benny Borremans; Christina Faust; Kezia R Manlove; Susanne H Sokolow; James O Lloyd-Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Mechanisms driving the density-area relationship in a saproxylic beetle.

Authors:  Heather B Jackson; Amanuel Zeccarias; James T Cronin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas.

Authors:  Sonia G Rabasa; David Gutiérrez; Adrián Escudero
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Pheromone production, male abundance, body size, and the evolution of elaborate antennae in moths.

Authors:  Matthew Re Symonds; Tamara L Johnson; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Odour maps in the brain of butterflies with divergent host-plant preferences.

Authors:  Mikael A Carlsson; Sonja Bisch-Knaden; Alexander Schäpers; Raimondas Mozuraitis; Bill S Hansson; Niklas Janz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Safeguarding Ecosystem Services: A Methodological Framework to Buffer the Joint Effect of Habitat Configuration and Climate Change.

Authors:  Tereza C Giannini; Leandro R Tambosi; André L Acosta; Rodolfo Jaffé; Antonio M Saraiva; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Jean Paul Metzger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brain composition in Godyris zavaleta, a diurnal butterfly, Reflects an increased reliance on olfactory information.

Authors:  Stephen H Montgomery; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.