Literature DB >> 14505022

Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation.

Jochen Krauss1, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Teja Tscharntke.   

Abstract

Temporal dynamics of insect communities in terrestrial habitat fragments have been rarely studied. Here it was tested whether immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterfly species change with area and isolation of 31 calcareous grasslands. The area ranged from 0.03 to 5.14 ha, the isolation index from 2,100 to 86,000 (edge-to-edge distance 55-1,894 m). In both study years (1996, 2000), the total number of individuals (16,466, 15,101) and species (60, 54) sampled across all sites were similar and number of species increased with area in both years indicating an equilibrium. Rates of extinction (38% for habitat specialists vs. 20% for generalists) and turnover (51% vs. 35%) were higher, and rates of immigration (11% vs. 30%) were lower for habitat specialists than for generalists. Extinction and turnover rates decreased with increasing fragment size for both specialist ( n=25 species) and generalist ( n=36) butterflies, but specialists showed a significantly steeper decrease with increasing fragment size than generalists. Immigration rates increased with area. As a result, species number of habitat specialists declined in small habitats but not in large habitats between 1996 and 2000. No significant impact of habitat isolation on the butterfly community was found. The data suggest that large habitat fragments are of special importance for the conservation of the specialized, most endangered butterfly species. Habitat isolation appears to be less important, as butterflies can cope with the habitat mosaic in our study region.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14505022     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1353-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

Authors:  M S Warren; J K Hill; J A Thomas; J Asher; R Fox; B Huntley; D B Roy; M G Telfer; S Jeffcoate; P Harding; G Jeffcoate; S G Willis; J N Greatorex-Davies; D Moss; C D Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Avifaunal equilibria and species turnover rates on the channel islands of california.

Authors:  J M Diamond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control.

Authors:  A Kruess; T Tscharntke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix.

Authors:  J Vandermeer; R Carvajal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  C D Thomas; J A Thomas; M S Warren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Insular biogeography of the montane butterfly faunas in the Great Basin: comparison with birds and mammals.

Authors:  Bruce A Wilcox; Dennis D Murphy; Paul R Ehrlich; George T Austin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Extinction, turnover and species diversity in an experimentally fragmented California annual grassland.

Authors:  George R Robinson; James F Quinn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Ground beetle species in heathland fragments in relation to survival, dispersal, and habitat preference.

Authors:  H H de Vries; P J den Boer; Th S van Dijk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Does fragmentation of Urtica habitats affect phytophagous and predatory insects differentially?

Authors:  Jörg Zabel; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations.

Authors:  I Hanski; M C Singer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.926

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Small-scale experimental habitat fragmentation reduces colonization rates in species-rich grasslands.

Authors:  Jasmin Joshi; Peter Stoll; Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Bernhard Schmid; Claudine Dolt; Bruno Baur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison.

Authors:  Peter A Hambäck; Keith S Summerville; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Jochen Krauss; Göran Englund; Thomas O Crist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Increasing crop field size does not consistently exacerbate insect pest problems.

Authors:  Jay A Rosenheim; Emma Cluff; Mia K Lippey; Bodil N Cass; Daniel Paredes; Soroush Parsa; Daniel S Karp; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Linking indices for biodiversity monitoring to extinction risk theory.

Authors:  Michael A McCarthy; Alana L Moore; Jochen Krauss; John W Morgan; Christopher F Clements
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Changes in Alpine Butterfly Communities during the Last 40 Years.

Authors:  Simona Bonelli; Cristiana Cerrato; Francesca Barbero; Maria Virginia Boiani; Giorgio Buffa; Luca Pietro Casacci; Lorenzo Fracastoro; Antonello Provenzale; Enrico Rivella; Michele Zaccagno; Emilio Balletto
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.769

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.