Literature DB >> 17484738

Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Derek A Abbott1, Theo A Knijnenburg, Linda M I de Poorter, Marcel J T Reinders, Jack T Pronk, Antonius J A van Maris.   

Abstract

Transcriptional responses to four weak organic acids (benzoate, sorbate, acetate and propionate) were investigated in anaerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To enable quantitative comparison of the responses to the acids, their concentrations were chosen such that they caused a 50% decrease of the biomass yield on glucose. The concentration of each acid required to achieve this yield was negatively correlated with membrane affinity. Microarray analysis revealed that each acid caused hundreds of transcripts to change by over twofold relative to reference cultures without added organic acids. However, only 14 genes were consistently upregulated in response to all acids. The moderately lipophilic compounds benzoate and sorbate and, to a lesser extent, the less lipophilic acids acetate and propionate showed overlapping transcriptional responses. Statistical analysis for overrepresented functional categories and upstream regulatory elements indicated that responses to the strongly lipophilic acids were focused on genes related to the cell wall, while acetate and propionate had a stronger impact on membrane-associated transport processes. The fact that S. cerevisiae exhibits a minimal generic transcriptional response to weak organic acids along with extensive specific responses is relevant for interpreting and controlling weak acid toxicity in food products and in industrial fermentation processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484738     DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00242.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  43 in total

Review 1.  Omics analysis of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Peng Geng; Liang Zhang; Gui Yang Shi
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The transcriptional response of Listeria monocytogenes during adaptation to growth on lactate and diacetate includes synergistic changes that increase fermentative acetoin production.

Authors:  Matthew J Stasiewicz; Martin Wiedmann; Teresa M Bergholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transcriptional regulation and the diversification of metabolism in wine yeast strains.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Dan Jacobson; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dao-Qiong Zheng; Xue-Chang Wu; Pin-Mei Wang; Xiao-Qin Chi; Xiang-Lin Tao; Ping Li; Xin-Hang Jiang; Yu-Hua Zhao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Casein Kinase I Isoform Hrr25 Is a Negative Regulator of Haa1 in the Weak Acid Stress Response Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Morgan E Collins; Joshua J Black; Zhengchang Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Physiological and transcriptional responses to high concentrations of lactic acid in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; Erwin Suir; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Roberto Olivares-Hernandes; Jens Nielsen; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Quantitative analysis of the modes of growth inhibition by weak organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Azmat Ullah; Rick Orij; Stanley Brul; Gertien J Smits
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Laboratory evolution for forced glucose-xylose co-consumption enables identification of mutations that improve mixed-sugar fermentation by xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Sanne J Wiersma; Maaike Goudriaan; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.