BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although bovine pericardium has been used extensively in cardiothoracic surgery, its degeneration and calcification are important limiting factors in the continued use of this material. The study aims were to decellularize bovine pericardium and to compare the biomechanical properties of fresh and decellularized bovine pericardia to those treated with different concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA). METHODS: An established protocol for decellularization using sodium dodecyl sulfate was used, and histological analysis performed to validate the adequacy of decellularization. Contact cytotoxicity was used to study the in-vitro biocompatibility of variously treated pericardia. Mechanical testing involved uniaxial testing to failure. Mechanical properties of the fresh and decellularized pericardia (untreated and treated with 0.5% and 0.05% GA) were compared. RESULTS: Histological analysis of decellularized bovine pericardium did not show any remaining cells or cell fragments. The histoarchitecture of the collagen-elastin matrix appeared well preserved. Untreated decellularized pericardium was biocompatible in contact cytotoxicity tests with smooth muscle and fibroblast cells. The GA-treated tissue was cytotoxic. There were no significant differences in the mechanical properties of fresh and decellularized pericardia, but there was an overall tendency for GA-treated pericardia to be stiffer than their untreated counterparts. CONCLUSION: An acellular matrix, cross-linked with a reduced concentration of GA, can be produced using bovine pericardium. This biomaterial has excellent biomechanical properties and, potentially, may be used in the manufacture of heart valves and pericardial patches for clinical application.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although bovine pericardium has been used extensively in cardiothoracic surgery, its degeneration and calcification are important limiting factors in the continued use of this material. The study aims were to decellularize bovine pericardium and to compare the biomechanical properties of fresh and decellularized bovine pericardia to those treated with different concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA). METHODS: An established protocol for decellularization using sodium dodecyl sulfate was used, and histological analysis performed to validate the adequacy of decellularization. Contact cytotoxicity was used to study the in-vitro biocompatibility of variously treated pericardia. Mechanical testing involved uniaxial testing to failure. Mechanical properties of the fresh and decellularized pericardia (untreated and treated with 0.5% and 0.05% GA) were compared. RESULTS: Histological analysis of decellularized bovine pericardium did not show any remaining cells or cell fragments. The histoarchitecture of the collagen-elastin matrix appeared well preserved. Untreated decellularized pericardium was biocompatible in contact cytotoxicity tests with smooth muscle and fibroblast cells. The GA-treated tissue was cytotoxic. There were no significant differences in the mechanical properties of fresh and decellularized pericardia, but there was an overall tendency for GA-treated pericardia to be stiffer than their untreated counterparts. CONCLUSION: An acellular matrix, cross-linked with a reduced concentration of GA, can be produced using bovine pericardium. This biomaterial has excellent biomechanical properties and, potentially, may be used in the manufacture of heart valves and pericardial patches for clinical application.
Authors: Xin Li; Yuanyuan Guo; Kenneth R Ziegler; Lynn S Model; Sammy D D Eghbalieh; Robert A Brenes; Susun T Kim; Chang Shu; Alan Dardik Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Hualong Bai; Go Kuwahara; Mo Wang; Kirstyn E Brownson; Trenton R Foster; Kota Yamamoto; Ying Xing; Alan Dardik Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: L Botes; L Laker; P M Dohmen; J J van den Heever; C J Jordaan; A Lewies; F E Smit Journal: Cell Tissue Bank Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: Mary E Tedder; Jun Liao; Benjamin Weed; Christopher Stabler; Henry Zhang; Agneta Simionescu; Dan T Simionescu Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Vadim Elagin; Daria Kuznetsova; Ekaterina Grebenik; Denis A Zolotov; Leonid Istranov; Tatiana Zharikova; Elena Istranova; Anastasia Polozova; Dmitry Reunov; Alexandr Kurkov; Anatoly Shekhter; Elvira R Gafarova; Victor Asadchikov; Sergey M Borisov; Ruslan I Dmitriev; Elena Zagaynova; Peter Timashev Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2020-02-19