Literature DB >> 35037183

Advantages of decellularized bovine pericardial scaffolds compared to glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardial patches demonstrated in a 180-day implant ovine study.

L Botes1, L Laker2, P M Dohmen2,3, J J van den Heever2, C J Jordaan2, A Lewies2, F E Smit2.   

Abstract

Glutaraldehyde (GA)-fixed bovine pericardial patches remain the cardiovascular industry standard despite reports of degradation, thickening, inflammation, calcification and lack of tissue remodelling. Decellularization provides the opportunity to attenuate some of these immune-mediated processes. This study compared the mechanical and morphological integrity of bovine pericardium that is GA-fixated (Glycar® patches) or decellularized (BPS), using a proprietary protocol, following implantation in an ovine model. The impact of the processing methods on tissue strength and morphology was assessed prior to implantation. Pericardial patches were then implanted in the descending aorta and main pulmonary artery of juvenile sheep (n = 6 per group) for 180 days, and clinically evaluated using echocardiography. At explanation, patches were evaluated for strength, calcification and biological interaction. Histology demonstrated a wave-like appearance of well-separated collagen fibers for BPS scaffolds that provided pore sizes adequate to promote fibroblast infiltration. The collagen of the Glycar® patches showed loss of collagen fiber integrity, making the collagen densely compacted, contributing to insignificant recipient cell infiltration. The clinical performance of both groups was excellent, and echocardiography confirmed the absence of aneurysm formation, calcification and degeneration. Explanted Glycar® patches demonstrated cells in abundance within the fibrous encapsulation that separated the implant from the host tissue. More importantly, the fibrous encapsulation also contributed to patch thickening of both the explanted aorta and pulmonary patches. The decellularized pericardial scaffolds demonstrated recellularization, resistance to calcification, re-endothelialization and adequate strength after 180-day implantation. The proprietary decellularization protocol produced pericardial scaffolds that could be considered as an alternative to GA-fixed pericardial patches.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine; Calcification; Decellularization; Fixation; Glutaraldehyde; Pericardium; Re-cellularization

Year:  2022        PMID: 35037183     DOI: 10.1007/s10561-021-09988-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  27 in total

1.  Decellularization as an anticalcification method in stentless bovine pericardium valve prosthesis: a study in sheep.

Authors:  Claudinei Collatusso; João Gabriel Roderjan; Eduardo Discher Vieira; Nelson Itiro Myague; Lúcia de Noronha; Francisco Diniz Affonso da Costa
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Procollagen trafficking, processing and fibrillogenesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Canty; Karl E Kadler
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Immune response to biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 4.  Decellularization of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; Tiffany L Sellaro; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  To cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices.

Authors:  Luis M Delgado; Yves Bayon; Abhay Pandit; Dimitrios I Zeugolis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Corrigendum to "Characterization of a new decellularized bovine pericardial biological mesh: Structural and mechanical properties" [J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 78 (2018) 420-426].

Authors:  Alessandra Bielli; Roberta Bernardini; Dimitrios Varvaras; Piero Rossi; Giancarlo Di Blasi; Giuseppe Petrella; Oreste Claudio Buonomo; Maurizio Mattei; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-20

7.  Development of a pericardial acellular matrix biomaterial: biochemical and mechanical effects of cell extraction.

Authors:  D W Courtman; C A Pereira; V Kashef; D McComb; J M Lee; G J Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-06

Review 8.  An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes.

Authors:  Peter M Crapo; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Biochemical changes and cytotoxicity associated with the degradation of polymeric glutaraldehyde derived crosslinks.

Authors:  L L Huang-Lee; D T Cheung; M E Nimni
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-09

10.  Tissue processing techniques for fabrication of covered stents for small-diameter vascular intervention.

Authors:  Shahar Cohen; Smadar Magal; Itay Yakov; Evyatar Sirabella; Anna Bitman; Gabriel Groisman; Chaim Lotan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Three Different Processing Techniques on the Strength and Structure of Juvenile Ovine Pulmonary Homografts.

Authors:  Johannes J van den Heever; Christiaan J Jordaan; Angélique Lewies; Jacqueline Goedhals; Dreyer Bester; Lezelle Botes; Pascal M Dohmen; Francis E Smit
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.