BACKGROUND: The use of self-reported data in epidemiological surveys leads to misclassification of the prevalence of obesity as the participants overestimate or underestimate height, weight and/or both. Such misclassifications vary according to gender, age, status and ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: To estimate on a sample of youth of both sexes (1) the difference between self-reported data and measured height and weight and (2) the extent of misclassification of BMI deriving from such differences. METHODS: Self-reporting in questionnaires and subsequent measurements of height and weight conducted by trained personnel. The mean values and the BMIs were calculated. RESULTS: Both sexes overestimate height (2.1 and 2.8cm for males and females, respectively), and underestimate weight (1.5 and 1.9kg for males and females, respectively). Consequently the BMI is underestimated (1.1 and 1.5 points for males and females, respectively). The classification of BMI from self-reported data shows underestimation of overweight in both sexes (8 percentage points) and of obese males (3.3 percentage points), an overestimation of normal weight (12.2 and 4.3 percentage points for males and females, respectively) and an excessive underweight in the girls (4.3 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference between self-reported and measured data and self-reported biases are reflected in the classification of the participants in the 4 categories of BMI.
BACKGROUND: The use of self-reported data in epidemiological surveys leads to misclassification of the prevalence of obesity as the participants overestimate or underestimate height, weight and/or both. Such misclassifications vary according to gender, age, status and ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: To estimate on a sample of youth of both sexes (1) the difference between self-reported data and measured height and weight and (2) the extent of misclassification of BMI deriving from such differences. METHODS: Self-reporting in questionnaires and subsequent measurements of height and weight conducted by trained personnel. The mean values and the BMIs were calculated. RESULTS: Both sexes overestimate height (2.1 and 2.8cm for males and females, respectively), and underestimate weight (1.5 and 1.9kg for males and females, respectively). Consequently the BMI is underestimated (1.1 and 1.5 points for males and females, respectively). The classification of BMI from self-reported data shows underestimation of overweight in both sexes (8 percentage points) and of obese males (3.3 percentage points), an overestimation of normal weight (12.2 and 4.3 percentage points for males and females, respectively) and an excessive underweight in the girls (4.3 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference between self-reported and measured data and self-reported biases are reflected in the classification of the participants in the 4 categories of BMI.
Authors: Jenna L Riis; Crystal I Bryce; Marla J Matin; John L Stebbins; Olga Kornienko; Lauren van Huisstede; Douglas A Granger Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun; Young Ae Kim; Minkyung Jo; Young-Joo Won; Joung Hwan Back; Eun-Sook Lee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wilma M Hopman; Claudie Berger; Lawrence Joseph; Susan I Barr; Yongjun Gao; Jerilynn C Prior; Suzette Poliquin; Tanveer Towheed; Tassos Anastassiades Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Isaac C Rhew; Laura P Richardson; Jim Lymp; Anne McTiernan; Elizabeth McCauley; Ann Vander Stoep Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Tineke De Vriendt; Inge Huybrechts; Charlene Ottevaere; Inge Van Trimpont; Stefaan De Henauw Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 3.390