Literature DB >> 17479233

Size determines antennal sensitivity and behavioral threshold to odors in bumblebee workers.

Johannes Spaethe1, Axel Brockmann, Christine Halbig, Jürgen Tautz.   

Abstract

The eusocial bumblebees exhibit pronounced size variation among workers of the same colony. Differently sized workers engage in different tasks (alloethism); large individuals are found to have a higher probability to leave the colony and search for food, whereas small workers tend to stay inside the nest and attend to nest duties. We investigated the effect of size variation on morphology and physiology of the peripheral olfactory system and the behavioral response thresholds to odors in workers of Bombus terrestris. Number and density of olfactory sensilla on the antennae correlate significantly with worker size. Consistent with these morphological changes, we found that antennal sensitivity to odors increases with body size. Antennae of large individuals show higher electroantennogram responses to a given odor concentration than those of smaller nestmates. This finding indicates that large antennae exhibit an increased capability to catch odor molecules and thus are more sensitive to odors than small antennae. We confirmed this prediction in a dual choice behavioral experiment showing that large workers indeed are able to respond correctly to much lower odor concentrations than small workers. Learning performance in these experiments did not differ between small and large bumblebees. Our results clearly show that, in the social bumblebees, variation in olfactory sensilla number due to size differences among workers strongly affects individual odor sensitivity. We speculate that superior odor sensitivity of large workers has favored size-related division of labor in bumblebee colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17479233     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-007-0251-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  8 in total

Review 1.  Models of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  S N Beshers; J H Fewell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 2.  Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models.

Authors:  Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees.

Authors:  Johannes Spaethe; Lars Chittka
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Coevolution of generalist feeding ecologies and gyrencephalic mushroom bodies in insects.

Authors:  Sarah M Farris; Nathan S Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla.

Authors:  J G Hildebrand; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Brain allometry in bumblebee and honey bee workers.

Authors:  Stefanie Mares; Lesley Ash; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Olfactory shifts parallel superspecialism for toxic fruit in Drosophila melanogaster sibling, D. sechellia.

Authors:  Teun Dekker; Irene Ibba; K P Siju; Marcus C Stensmyr; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 10.834

  8 in total
  44 in total

1.  Brain allometry and neural plasticity in the bumblebee Bombus occidentalis.

Authors:  Andre J Riveros; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Helene Muller
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

3.  Bumblebees are able to perceive amino acids via chemotactile antennal stimulation.

Authors:  Fabian A Ruedenauer; Sara D Leonhardt; Klaus Lunau; Johannes Spaethe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Solitary bees reduce investment in communication compared with their social relatives.

Authors:  Bernadette Wittwer; Abraham Hefetz; Tovit Simon; Li E K Murphy; Mark A Elgar; Naomi E Pierce; Sarah D Kocher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual selection on receptor organ traits: younger females attract males with longer antennae.

Authors:  Tamara L Johnson; Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 6.  Insect societies fight back: the evolution of defensive traits against social parasites.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Evelien Jongepier; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The antennal sensilla of Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini): a study of different sexes and castes.

Authors:  Samira Veiga Ravaiano; Ríudo de Paiva Ferreira; Lucio Antonio de Oliveira Campos; Gustavo Ferreira Martins
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-05-27

8.  Antennal scales improve signal detection efficiency in moths.

Authors:  Qike Wang; Yidan Shang; Douglas S Hilton; Kiao Inthavong; Dong Zhang; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The evolution of sexual signal modes and associated sensor morphology in fireflies (Lampyridae, Coleoptera).

Authors:  Kathrin F Stanger-Hall; Sarah E Sander Lower; Lauri Lindberg; Andrew Hopkins; Jenna Pallansch; David W Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Bumblebees exhibit the memory spacing effect.

Authors:  Nicholas R T Toda; Jeremy Song; James C Nieh
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.