Literature DB >> 29866913

Insect societies fight back: the evolution of defensive traits against social parasites.

Christoph Grüter1, Evelien Jongepier2, Susanne Foitzik3.   

Abstract

Insect societies face many social parasites that exploit their altruistic behaviours or their resources. Due to the fitness costs these social parasites incur, hosts have evolved various behavioural, chemical, architectural and morphological defence traits. Similar to bacteria infecting multicellular hosts, social parasites have to successfully go through several steps to exploit their hosts. Here, we review how social insects try to interrupt this sequence of events. They can avoid parasite contact by choosing to nest in parasite-free locales or evade attacks by adapting their colony structure. Once social parasites attack, hosts attempt to detect them, which can be facilitated by adjustments in colony odour. If social parasites enter the nest, hosts can either aggressively defend their colony or take their young and flee. Nest structures are often shaped to prevent social parasite invasion or to safeguard host resources. Finally, if social parasites successfully establish themselves in host nests, hosts can rebel by killing the parasite brood or by reproducing in the parasites' presence. Hosts of social parasites can therefore develop multiple traits, leading to the evolution of complex defence portfolios of co-dependent traits. Social parasites can respond to these multi-level defences with counter-adaptations, potentially leading to geographical mosaics of coevolution.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  behaviour; coevolution; cuticular hydrocarbons; defence portfolios; resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866913      PMCID: PMC6000133          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  63 in total

1.  Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges.

Authors:  S L Nuismer; J N Thompson; R Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 2.  Social immunity.

Authors:  Sylvia Cremer; Sophie A O Armitage; Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Propaganda substances in the cuckoo antLeptothorax kutteri and the slave-makerHarpagoxenus sublaevis.

Authors:  A B Allies; A F Bourke; N R Franks
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Interference interactions and nest usurpation between two subordinate ant species.

Authors:  Xim Cerdá; Javier Retana
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. II. Frequency of slave raids and impact on the host population.

Authors:  S Foitzik; J M Herbers
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Bees at war: interspecific battles and nest usurpation in stingless bees.

Authors:  John Paul Cunningham; James P Hereward; Tim A Heard; Paul J De Barro; Stuart A West
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Population structure and the co-evolution between social parasites and their hosts.

Authors:  Miriam Brandt; Birgit Fischer-Blass; Jürgen Heinze; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts.

Authors:  Susanne Foitzik; Alexandra Achenbach; Miriam Brandt
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Local differences in parasitism and competition shape defensive investment in a polymorphic eusocial bee.

Authors:  Francisca H I D Segers; Lucas von Zuben; Christoph Grüter
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies.

Authors:  Thomas D Als; Roger Vila; Nikolai P Kandul; David R Nash; Shen-Horn Yen; Yu-Feng Hsu; André A Mignault; Jacobus J Boomsma; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Inquiline social parasites as tools to unlock the secrets of insect sociality.

Authors:  Alessandro Cini; Seirian Sumner; Rita Cervo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Brood parasitism in eusocial insects (Hymenoptera): role of host geographical range size and phylogeny.

Authors:  Jukka Suhonen; Jaakko J Ilvonen; Tommi Nyman; Jouni Sorvari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The possible role of ant larvae in the defence against social parasites.

Authors:  Unni Pulliainen; Heikki Helanterä; Liselotte Sundström; Eva Schultner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours.

Authors:  Cecile Sarabian; Val Curtis; Rachel McMullan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Relaxed selection underlies genome erosion in socially parasitic ant species.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma; Christian Rabeling; Lukas Schrader; Hailin Pan; Martin Bollazzi; Morten Schiøtt; Fredrick J Larabee; Xupeng Bi; Yuan Deng; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror).

Authors:  Heather R Mattila; Gard W Otis; Lien T P Nguyen; Hanh D Pham; Olivia M Knight; Ngoc T Phan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multi-queen breeding is associated with the origin of inquiline social parasitism in ants.

Authors:  Romain A Dahan; Christian Rabeling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Leg or antenna injury in Cataglyphis ants impairs survival but does not hinder searching for food.

Authors:  Tomer Gilad; Arik Dorfman; Aziz Subach; Inon Scharf
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.734

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.