Literature DB >> 17477288

Uncertainty in msPAF-based ecotoxicological effect factors for freshwater ecosystems in life cycle impact assessment.

Rosalie van Zelm1, Mark A J Huijbregts, Jasper V Harbers, Arjen Wintersen, Jaap Struijs, Leo Posthuma, Dik van de Meent.   

Abstract

Ecotoxicological effect factors are part of the analysis of relative impacts by chemical contaminants on ecosystems. Uncertainty distributions, represented by the 90% confidence interval, belonging to ecotoxicological effect factors for freshwater ecosystems were determined. This study includes 869 high production volume chemicals, related to 7 nonspecific toxic modes of action (TMoAs). The ecotoxicological effect factors are divided into a TMoA-specific part and a chemical-specific part. The 90% confidence interval of the TMoA-specific part of the effect factor ranges from 23 orders of magnitude for acrylate toxicity to 2 orders of magnitude for nonpolar narcosis. The range in the TMoA-specific part of the effect factor is mainly caused by uncertainty in the spread in toxic sensitivity between species (sigma(j)). Average uncertainty in the chemical-specific part of the effect factors depends on the number of species tested and ranges on average from a factor of 5 for more than 3 species tested to a factor of about 1,000 for 2 species tested. Average uncertainty in the ecotoxicological effect factors ranges from a factor of 100 for more than 3 species tested to a factor of nearly 10,000 for 2 species tested. It is recommended that the ecotoxicological effect factor of a chemical is based on toxicity data of at least 4 species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477288     DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2006-013.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  4 in total

1.  Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Nicoló Aurisano; Jane Bare; Thomas Backhaus; Cécile Bulle; Peter M Chapman; Dick De Zwart; Robert Dwyer; Alexi Ernstoff; Laura Golsteijn; Hanna Holmquist; Olivier Jolliet; Thomas E McKone; Mikołaj Owsianiak; Willie Peijnenburg; Leo Posthuma; Sandra Roos; Erwan Saouter; Diederik Schowanek; Nico M van Straalen; Martina G Vijver; Michael Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Human and ecotoxicological impacts assessment from the Mexican oil industry in the Coatzacoalcos region, as revealed by the USEtox model.

Authors:  M A Morales-Mora; B Rodríguez-Pérez; S A Martínez-Delgadillo; E Rosa-Domínguez; C Nolasco-Hipólito
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparing Options for Deriving Chemical Ecotoxicity Hazard Values for the European Union Environmental Footprint, Part II.

Authors:  Erwan Saouter; Deidre Wolff; Fabrizio Biganzoli; Donald Versteeg
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Estimating species sensitivity distributions on the basis of readily obtainable descriptors and toxicity data for three species of algae, crustaceans, and fish.

Authors:  Yuichi Iwasaki; Kiyan Sorgog
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.