Literature DB >> 17477266

Development of thermal surrogate microorganisms in ground beef for in-plant critical control point validation studies.

Li Ma1, Jeffrey L Kornacki, Guodong Zhang, Chia-Min Lin, Michael P Doyle.   

Abstract

In search of a suitable surrogate microorganism for in-plant critical control point validation, we compared the rates of thermal inactivation of three bacteria, Enterococcus faecium B2354, Pediococcus parvulus HP, and Pediococcus acidilactici LP, to those of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella. Ground beef samples containing 4 and 12% fat were inoculated with E. faecium, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W and heated at 58, 62, 65, or 68 degrees C. The decimal reduction times (D-values) for E. faecium B2354 in 4 and 12% fat ground beef were 4.4 to 17.7 and 3.6 to 14.6 times greater, respectively, than those for L. monocytogenes or Salmonella Senftenberg 775W at all temperatures tested, with the greatest differences in D-values occurring at 58 and 62 degrees C. Higher fat content protected bacteria from thermal inactivation in general, especially at temperatures lower than 68 degrees C. The heat resistance in a broth medium at 62degrees C of two food-grade bacteria, P. parvulus HP and P. acidilactici LP, was compared with that of the three strains under study. The D-values of P. parvulus HP and P. acidilactici LP were lower than those of E. faecium B2354 but 4.1 and 2.5 times greater, respectively, than those of Salmonella Senftenberg 775W, the most resistant pathogen. These results indicate that thermal treatments of ground beef at 58 to 68 degrees C that kill E. faecium B2354 will also kill Salmonella and L. monocytogenes, and the two Pediococcus isolates may serve as alternate surrogates for validation studies when a less heat-resistant surrogate is desired. However, additional studies in ground beef are needed with the Pediococcus strains in the desired temperature range intended for validation purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477266     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.4.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

Review 1.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Safety of the surrogate microorganism Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 for use in thermal process validation.

Authors:  Lauren M Kopit; Eun Bae Kim; Roland J Siezen; Linda J Harris; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Exponentially Increased Thermal Resistance of Salmonella spp. and Enterococcus faecium at Reduced Water Activity.

Authors:  Shuxiang Liu; Juming Tang; Ravi Kiran Tadapaneni; Ren Yang; Mei-Jun Zhu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Ultraviolet (UV-C) inactivation of Enterococcus faecium, Salmonella choleraesuis and Salmonella typhimurium in porcine plasma.

Authors:  Elena Blázquez; Carmen Rodríguez; Jesús Ródenas; Ana Pérez de Rozas; Joaquim Segalés; Joan Pujols; Javier Polo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Various Lactic Acid Bacteria and Generic E. coli as Potential Nonpathogenic Surrogates for In-Plant Validation of Biltong Dried Beef Processing.

Authors:  Caitlin E Karolenko; Jade Wilkinson; Peter M Muriana
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.