Literature DB >> 17476867

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results.

Franco Favretti1, Gianni Segato, David Ashton, Luca Busetto, Maurizio De Luca, Marco Mazza, Andrea Ceoloni, Oscar Banzato, Elisa Calo, Giuliano Enzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines 1,791 consecutive laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) procedures with up to 12 years follow-up. Long-term results of LAGB with a high follow-up rate are not common.
METHODS: Between September 1993 and December 2005, 1,791 consecutive patients (75.1% women, mean age 38.7 years, mean weight 127.7 +/- 24 kg, mean BMI 46.2 +/- 7.7) underwent LAGB by the same surgical team. Perigastric dissection was used in 77.8% of the patients, while subsequently pars flaccida was used in 21.5% and a mixed approach in 0.8%. Data were analyzed according to co-morbidities, conversion, short- and long-term complications and weight loss. Fluoroscopy-guided band adjustments were performed and patients received intensive follow-up. The effects of LAGB on life expectancy were measured in a case/control study involving 821 surgically-treated patients versus 821 treated by medical therapy.
RESULTS: Most common baseline co-morbidities (%) were hypertension (35.6), osteoarthritis (57.8), diabetes (22), dyslipidemia (27.1), sleep apnea syndrome (31.4), depression (21.2), sweet eating (22.5) and binge eating (18.5). Conversion to open was 1.7%: due to technical difficulties (1.2) and due to intraoperative complications (0.5). Together with the re-positioning of the band, additional surgery was performed in 11.9% of the patients: hiatal hernia repair (2.4), cholecystectomy (7.8) and other procedures (1.7). There was no mortality. Reoperation was required in 106 patients (5.9%): band removal 55 (3.7%), band repositioning 50 (2.7 %), and other 1 (0.05 %). Port-related complications occurred in 200 patients (11.2%). 41 patients (2.3%) underwent further surgery due to unsatisfactory results: removal of the band in 12 (0.7%), biliopancreatic diversion in 5 (0.27%) and a biliopancreatic diversion with gastric preservation ("bandinaro") in 24 (1.3%). Weight in kg was 103.7 +/- 21.6, 102.5 +/- 22.5, 105.0 +/- 23.6, 106.8 +/- 24.3, 103.3 +/- 26.2 and 101.4 +/- 27.1 at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 years after LAGB. BMI at the same intervals was 37.7 +/- 7.1, 37.2 +/- 7.2, 38.1 +/- 7.6, 38.5 +/- 7.9, 37.5 +/- 8.5 and 37.7 +/- 9.1. The case/control study found a statistically significant difference in survival in favor of the surgically-treated group.
CONCLUSIONS: LAGB can achieve effective, safe and stable long-term weight loss. In experienced hands, the complication rate is low. Follow-up is paramount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17476867     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-007-9043-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  20 in total

1.  Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue?

Authors:  Jerome Dargent
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Laparoscopic Italian experience with the Lap-Band.

Authors:  L Angrisani; M Alkilani; N Basso; N Belvederesi; F Campanile; F D Capizzi; C D'Atri; L Di Cosmo; S B Doldi; F Favretti; P Forestieri; F Furbetta; F Giacomelli; C Giardiello; A Iuppa; G Lesti; M Lucchese; F Puglisi; L Scipioni; M Toppino; G U Turicchia; A Veneziani; C Docimo; V Borrelli; M Lorenzo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (Lap-Band): how to avoid complications.

Authors:  F Favretti; G B Cadiere; G Segato; J Himpens; L Busetto; F De Marchi; M Vertruyen; G Enzi; M De Luca; M Lise
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Stanley E Williams
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, 1998 and 2000: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  George A Fielding; Jennifer E Duncombe
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Results of lap rebanding procedures after Lap-Band removal for band erosion -- a mid-term evaluation.

Authors:  Erik Niville; Anne Dams; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Hans Verhelst
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Surgical treatment of morbid obesity by adjustable gastric band: the case for a conservative strategy in the case of failure - a 9-year series.

Authors:  Jérôme Dargent
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Chevallier; Franck Zinzindohoué; Richard Douard; Jean-Philippe Blanche; Jean-Louis Berta; Jean-Jacques Altman; Paul-Henri Cugnenc
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss.

Authors:  D J Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1992-06

10.  Preoperative weight loss by intragastric balloon in super-obese patients treated with laparoscopic gastric banding: a case-control study.

Authors:  Luca Busetto; Gianni Segato; Maurizio De Luca; Enzo Bortolozzi; Tommaso MacCari; Alessandro Magon; Eminé Meral Inelmen; Franco Favretti; Giuliano Enzi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  88 in total

1.  Small-diameter bands lead to high complication rates in patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Juliane Matlach; Daniela Adolf; Frank Benedix; Stefanie Wolff
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Gastric banding: ethical dilemmas in reviewing body mass index thresholds.

Authors:  Kristin Voigt; Harald Schmidt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Cristian Gamboa; Gustavo Perez; Fernando Crovari; Alex Escalona; Fernando Pimentel; Alejandro Raddatz; Sergio Guzman; Luis Ibáñez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rishi Singhal; Catherine Bryant; Mark Kitchen; Khalid S Khan; Jon Deeks; Boliang Guo; Paul Super
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Pregnancy outcome in morbidly obese women before and after laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Annunziata Lapolla; Mariangela Marangon; Maria Grazia Dalfrà; Gianni Segato; Maurizio De Luca; Domenico Fedele; Franco Favretti; Giuliano Enzi; Luca Busetto
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Masha Livhits; Cheryl Mercado; Irina Yermilov; Janak A Parikh; Erik Dutson; Amir Mehran; Clifford Y Ko; Melinda Maggard Gibbons
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Long-term results of a prospective study on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Y Van Nieuwenhove; W Ceelen; A Stockman; H Vanommeslaeghe; E Snoeck; K Van Renterghem; D Van de Putte; P Pattyn
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Safety of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with concurrent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Nabeel R Obeid; Marina S Kurian; Christine J Ren-Fielding; George A Fielding; Bradley F Schwack
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Pawan Chansaenroj; Lwin Aung; Wei-Jei Lee; Shu Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen; Kong-Han Ser
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Isolated food intolerance after adjustable gastric banding: a major cause of long-term band removal.

Authors:  Jérôme Dargent
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.