BACKGROUND: There is no report of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer utilization in rectal surgery. The objective here was to evaluate the results of the use of this device in open low anterior resection for rectal cancer regarding reduction of operative time, hemostasis, and postoperative complications compared with the conventional technique. An additional aim was to describe and standardize this operative technique. MATERIAL/ METHODS: All open low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer performed by the same surgical team from January 2003 to December 2003 were reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups: those operated with the classic technique (group A) and those with a bipolar vessel sealer (group B). Main outcomes measured were operative and hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and duration, postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and final outcome. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included (group A: 19, group B: 22). The groups were similar in demographics, TNM classification, number of lymph nodes dissected, complications, blood transfusions, hospital stay, and outcome. Comparing group B with group A, operative time (171+/-10 vs. 203+/-20 min, p=0.002), intraoperative blood loss (20+/-6 vs. 60+/-4 ml, p=0.04), drainage volume (70+/-8 vs. 120+/-10 ml, p=0.001), and drainage duration (1.7+/-0.3 vs. 2.6+/-0.2 days, p=0.01) were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The bipolar vessel sealer is a safe and effective adjunct for low anterior resection. The device simplifies the procedure while achieving efficient hemostasis and results in reduced operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage volume and duration.
BACKGROUND: There is no report of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer utilization in rectal surgery. The objective here was to evaluate the results of the use of this device in open low anterior resection for rectal cancer regarding reduction of operative time, hemostasis, and postoperative complications compared with the conventional technique. An additional aim was to describe and standardize this operative technique. MATERIAL/ METHODS: All open low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer performed by the same surgical team from January 2003 to December 2003 were reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups: those operated with the classic technique (group A) and those with a bipolar vessel sealer (group B). Main outcomes measured were operative and hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and duration, postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and final outcome. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included (group A: 19, group B: 22). The groups were similar in demographics, TNM classification, number of lymph nodes dissected, complications, blood transfusions, hospital stay, and outcome. Comparing group B with group A, operative time (171+/-10 vs. 203+/-20 min, p=0.002), intraoperative blood loss (20+/-6 vs. 60+/-4 ml, p=0.04), drainage volume (70+/-8 vs. 120+/-10 ml, p=0.001), and drainage duration (1.7+/-0.3 vs. 2.6+/-0.2 days, p=0.01) were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The bipolar vessel sealer is a safe and effective adjunct for low anterior resection. The device simplifies the procedure while achieving efficient hemostasis and results in reduced operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage volume and duration.
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Stephen F Kappa; Todd M Morgan; Daniel A Barocas; Carl J Bischoff; Kirk A Keegan; Kelly L Stratton; Peter E Clark; Matthew J Resnick; Joseph A Smith; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 3.498