Literature DB >> 17472946

Induction of photosynthesis and importance of limitations during the induction phase in sun and shade leaves of five ecologically contrasting tree species from the temperate zone.

Otmar Urban1, Martina Kosvancová, Michal V Marek, Hartmut K Lichtenthaler.   

Abstract

We examined the principal differences in photosynthetic characteristics between sun and shade foliage and determined the relative importance of biochemical and stomatal limitations during photosynthetic induction. Temperate-zone broadleaf and conifer tree species, ranging widely in shade tolerance, were investigated from one locality in the Czech Republic. The study species included strongly shade-tolerant Abies alba Mill. and Tilia cordata Mill., less shade-tolerant Fagus sylvatica L. and Acer pseudoplatanus L. and sun-demanding Picea abies (L.) Karst. In the fully activated photosynthetic state, sun foliage of all species had significantly higher maximum CO(2) assimilation rates, maximum stomatal conductance and maximum rates of carboxylation than shade foliage. Compared with shade leaves, sun leaves had significantly higher nocturnal stomatal conductances. In all species, shade foliage tended to have higher induction states 60 s after leaf illumination than sun foliage. Sun and shade foliage did not differ in the rate of disappearance of the transient biochemical limitation during the induction phase. Longer time periods were required to reach 90% photosynthetic induction and 90% stomatal induction in sun foliage than in shade foliage of the less shade-tolerant F. sylvatica and A. pseudoplatanus and in sun-demanding P. abies; however, in sun foliage of the strongly shade-tolerant species T. cordata and A. alba, the time needed for photosynthetic induction was similar to, or less than, that for shade foliage. Shade but not sun needles of P. abies and A. alba had significantly slower induction kinetics than the broadleaf tree species. Among species, the sun-demanding P. abies exhibited the shortest stomatal induction times in both sun and shade leaves. Independently of shade tolerance ranking, the transient stomatal and total limitations that characterize photosynthetic induction were relieved significantly earlier in shade foliage than in sun foliage. Sun foliage generally exhibited a hyperbolic photosynthetic induction response, whereas a sigmoidal induction response was more frequent in shade foliage. The different relative proportions of transient biochemical and stomatal limitations during photosynthetic induction in sun and shade foliage indicate an essential role of stomata in photosynthetic limitation during induction, mainly in shade foliage, with a consequent influence on the shape of the photosynthetic induction curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472946     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/27.8.1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  8 in total

1.  Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Johannes Kromdijk; Jeremy Harbinson; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics, photosynthetic activity, and pigment composition of blue-shade and half-shade leaves as compared to sun and shade leaves of different trees.

Authors:  Hartmut K Lichtenthaler; Fatbardha Babani; Martin Navrátil; Claus Buschmann
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effects of Diffuse Light on Radiation Use Efficiency of Two Anthurium Cultivars Depend on the Response of Stomatal Conductance to Dynamic Light Intensity.

Authors:  Tao Li; Johannes Kromdijk; Ep Heuvelink; F R van Noort; Elias Kaiser; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance regardless of photosynthetic induction state.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Dianfan Zhou; Ep Heuvelink; Jeremy Harbinson; Alejandro Morales; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Whole Irradiated Plant Leaves Showed Faster Photosynthetic Induction Than Individually Irradiated Leaves via Improved Stomatal Opening.

Authors:  Shunji Shimadzu; Mitsunori Seo; Ichiro Terashima; Wataru Yamori
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Sunflecks in the upper canopy: dynamics of light-use efficiency in sun and shade leaves of Fagus sylvatica.

Authors:  Maxime Durand; Zsofia R Stangl; Yann Salmon; Alexandra J Burgess; Erik H Murchie; T Matthew Robson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 10.323

7.  Characterization of photosynthetic gas exchange in leaves under simulated adaxial and abaxial surfaces alternant irradiation.

Authors:  Zi-Shan Zhang; Yu-Ting Li; Hui-Yuan Gao; Cheng Yang; Qing-Wei Meng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Conjoint Analysis of Genome-Wide lncRNA and mRNA Expression of Heteromorphic Leavesin Response to Environmental Heterogeneityin Populus euphratica.

Authors:  Ming Zeng; Shuhang He; Lin Hao; Yujie Li; Caixia Zheng; Yuanyuan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.