Literature DB >> 17471572

Birth weight and the risk of testicular cancer: a meta-analysis.

Athanasios Michos1, Fei Xue, Karin B Michels.   

Abstract

The high incidence of testicular cancer in young males indicates a potential role of events during early life. Birth weight has been identified as a factor possibly associated with the risk of cancers later in life. To investigate the association between birth weight and testicular cancer, we conducted a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of published studies investigating the association between birth weight and testicular cancer. Data were combined using a fixed-effects model. Thirteen epidemiologic studies, published between 1983 and 2004, were included in the analysis, encompassing 5,663 patients with testicular cancer. Men weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth had a higher risk for developing testicular cancer later in life than those with normal birth weight (2,500-4,000 g) (OR = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.38). A similar trend was found for men with a birth weight above 4,000 g, (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.22). When seminoma and nonseminoma testicular cancer cases were considered separately, low birth weight was a risk factor specifically for seminomas (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.11-1.88). A U-shaped association was observed between birth weight and the risk for testicular cancer. The underlying biological mechanisms for this phenomenon remain to be elucidated. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471572     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  17 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal variables in relation to the risk of testicular cancer--experiences of the son.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Olof Akre; David Forman; M Patricia Madigan; Lorenzo Richiardi; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  The maternal womb: a novel target for cancer prevention in the era of the obesity pandemic?

Authors:  Frank A Simmen; Rosalia C M Simmen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Induction and persistence of abnormal testicular germ cells following gestational exposure to di-(n-butyl) phthalate in p53-null mice.

Authors:  Camelia M Saffarini; Nicholas E Heger; Hideki Yamasaki; Tao Liu; Susan J Hall; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2011-08-25

Review 4.  Maternal body mass index and risk of testicular cancer in male offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shama S Alam; Marie M Cantwell; Chris R Cardwell; Michael B Cook; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Gender-specific differences in birthweight and the odds of puberty: NHANES III, 1988-94.

Authors:  Susan Olivo-Marston; Barry I Graubard; Kala Visvanathan; Michele R Forman
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Association of birth weight with cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Xiaoying Chen; Donghong Wu; Huiting Wang; Chuqiao Wang; Jieni Shen; Yiran An; Ran Zhong; Caichen Li; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.322

7.  Infant feeding and the incidence of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Fei Xue; Leena A Hilakivi-Clarke; G Larry Maxwell; Susan E Hankinson; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Transgenerational epigenetic effects of the Apobec1 cytidine deaminase deficiency on testicular germ cell tumor susceptibility and embryonic viability.

Authors:  Vicki R Nelson; Jason D Heaney; Paul J Tesar; Nicholas O Davidson; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Male reprotoxicity and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Sarah Campion; Natasha Catlin; Nicholas Heger; Elizabeth V McDonnell; Sara E Pacheco; Camelia Saffarini; Moses A Sandrof; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  Exp Suppl       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans.

Authors:  A Thankamony; V Pasterski; K K Ong; C L Acerini; I A Hughes
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.