Literature DB >> 17471119

How does antigen retrieval work?

Trishe Y-M Leong1, Anthony S-Y Leong.   

Abstract

The introduction of antigen retrieval has enabled immunohistology to become an integral component of morphologic diagnosis, routinely employed in cancer diagnosis, and for the identification of therapeutic and prognostic markers. The mechanism of antigen retrieval, however, remains speculative with the key to our understanding embedded in the actions of formaldehyde on proteins. One commonly held concept is that heat primarily breaks down protein cross-linkages that occur with aldehyde fixation, thus "unmasking" protein epitopes of interest. Enzymatic pretreatment is also thought to have a similar action whereas such "breakages" are the result of extremely rapid molecular movement induced by microwaves and ultrasound. The formation of rigid cagelike calcium complexes during formaldehyde fixation is another suggested mechanism of antigen masking requiring chelating agents for reversal. A more recent suggestion for the antigen retrieval phenomenon has evoked the Mannich reaction, which occurs with the cross-linking of some proteins. Such cross-linkages can be hydrolyzed by heat or alkalis so that the process of antigen retrieval may be the simple removal of such cross-linked proteins that are sterically interfering with the binding of antibodies to linear protein epitopes in the tissue section. We are clearly not yet in possession of all the answers to the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471119     DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31803250c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  10 in total

1.  Efficient single muscle fiber isolation from alcohol-fixed adult muscle following β-galactosidase staining for satellite cell detection.

Authors:  Mayank Verma; Atsushi Asakura
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: a pathologist's perspective. II. interpretation of the bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.

Authors:  Roger S Riley; David Williams; Micaela Ross; Shawn Zhao; Alden Chesney; Bradly D Clark; Jonathan M Ben-Ezra
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Analysis of Immune Cells in Single Sciatic Nerves and Dorsal Root Ganglion from a Single Mouse Using Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Asa S Hidmark; Peter P Nawroth; Thomas Fleming
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Analytic variability in immunohistochemistry biomarker studies.

Authors:  Valsamo K Anagnostou; Allison W Welsh; Jennifer M Giltnane; Summar Siddiqui; Camil Liceaga; Mark Gustavson; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Jill L Reiter; David L Rimm
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Enhancing Antigen Retrieval to Unmask Signaling Phosphoproteins in Formalin-fixed Archival Tissues.

Authors:  Bhawana George; Abedul Haque; Vishal Sahu; Albina Joldoshova; Yashandeep Singh; Janet E Quinones; Suraj Konnath George; Hesham M Amin
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) Analysis of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in Formalin Fixed Tumor Tissue.

Authors:  Todd Hembrough; Sheeno Thyparambil; Wei-Li Liao; Marlene M Darfler; Joseph Abdo; Kathleen M Bengali; Paul Taylor; Jiefei Tong; Humberto Lara-Guerra; Thomas K Waddell; Michael F Moran; Ming-Sound Tsao; David B Krizman; Jon Burrows
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.988

7.  Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Xin Meng; Celine Jones; Pedro Melo; Caroline Ross; Ginny Mounce; Tim Child; Kevin Coward
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.054

8.  Nanoscale Imaging of Kidney Glomeruli Using Expansion Pathology.

Authors:  Octavian Bucur; Yongxin Zhao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 9.  Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: how to open a Pandora's box.

Authors:  Caterina Marchiò; Mitch Dowsett; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Garbage in, garbage out: a critical evaluation of strategies used for validation of immunohistochemical biomarkers.

Authors:  Gillian O'Hurley; Evelina Sjöstedt; Arman Rahman; Bo Li; Caroline Kampf; Fredrik Pontén; William M Gallagher; Cecilia Lindskog
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.603

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.