Literature DB >> 17470435

Population genetics without intraspecific data.

Jeffrey L Thorne1, Sang Chul Choi, Jiaye Yu, Paul G Higgs, Hirohisa Kishino.   

Abstract

A central goal of computational biology is the prediction of phenotype from DNA and protein sequence data. Recent models of sequence change use in silico prediction systems to incorporate the effects of phenotype on evolutionary rates. These models have been designed for analyzing sequence data from different species and have been accompanied by statistical techniques for estimating model parameters when the incorporation of phenotype induces dependent change among sequence positions. A difficulty with these efforts to link phenotype and interspecific evolution is that evolution occurs within populations, and parameters of interspecific models should have population genetic interpretations. We show, with two examples, how population genetic interpretations can be assigned to evolutionary models. The first example considers the impact of RNA secondary structure on sequence change, and the second reflects the tendency for protein tertiary structure to influence nonsynonymous substitution rates. We argue that statistical fit to data should not be the sole criterion for assessing models of sequence change. A good interspecific model should also yield a clear and biologically plausible population genetic interpretation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470435     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  20 in total

1.  Basing population genetic inferences and models of molecular evolution upon desired stationary distributions of DNA or protein sequences.

Authors:  Sang Chul Choi; Benjamin D Redelings; Jeffrey L Thorne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Models of coding sequence evolution.

Authors:  Wayne Delport; Konrad Scheffler; Cathal Seoighe
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Bayesian comparisons of codon substitution models.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigue; Nicolas Lartillot; Hervé Philippe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigue; Hervé Philippe; Nicolas Lartillot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  History can matter: non-Markovian behavior of ancestral lineages.

Authors:  Reed A Cartwright; Nicolas Lartillot; Jeffrey L Thorne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  The relationship between dN/dS and scaled selection coefficients.

Authors:  Stephanie J Spielman; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  A penalized-likelihood method to estimate the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data.

Authors:  Asif U Tamuri; Nick Goldman; Mario dos Reis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A Comparison of One-Rate and Two-Rate Inference Frameworks for Site-Specific dN/dS Estimation.

Authors:  Stephanie J Spielman; Suyang Wan; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Lineage-specific differences in the amino acid substitution process.

Authors:  Snehalata Huzurbazar; Grigory Kolesov; Steven E Massey; Katherine C Harris; Alexander Churbanov; David A Liberles
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Inferring selection on amino acid preference in protein domains.

Authors:  Alan M Moses; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.