Literature DB >> 17470022

Influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis: histomorphometric analysis in sheep.

Marco Franchi1, Beatrice Bacchelli, Gianluca Giavaresi, Viviana De Pasquale, Désirée Martini, Milena Fini, Roberto Giardino, Alessandro Ruggeri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study investigated peri-implant osteogenesis and implant biologic fixation in different zirconia sandblasted endosseous titanium surfaces (SLA-60 and SLA-120) and a turned titanium surface (T) 2 and 4 weeks after surgery.
METHODS: Seventy-two implant screws were implanted in tibia of six sheep. Histologic sections of implants (2 and 4 weeks after surgery) were analyzed with light microscopy for histomorphometric analysis of bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone ingrowth (BI), and bone surface (BS/BV). Histologic blocks were used to perform bone microhardness studies next to the implants. Some implants were also observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
RESULTS: In general, the highest values of BIC, BI, BS/BV, and Vickers hardness number (HV) were measured in SLA-60 samples, followed by SLA-120 and T implants. Two weeks after surgery, all the implants appeared biologically fixed by a newly formed woven bone arranged in thin bone trabeculae and filling the gap between implant and host bone. Four weeks after implantation, the thickness of the woven bone trabeculae had increased, especially around the SLA-60 and SLA-120 implants by a gradual deposition of parallel-fiber bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in the early period of peri-implant healing, the implant surface morphology that seemed to influence the increase of peri-implant osteogenesis, bone turnover, and peri-implant bone maturation was SLA-60. We suggest that this surface, characterized by moderately deep titanium cavities very similar to the osteocyte lacunae, could act as a microscopic scaffold for mesenchymal and/or osteoblast-like cells adhesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470022     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  15 in total

Review 1.  Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Hameeda Bashir Ahmed; Roberto Crespi; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2013-12-20

2.  Implant stability in different techniques of surgical sites preparation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Rastelli; G Falisi; R Gatto; M Galli; E Saccone; M Severino; C DI Paolo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

Review 3.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Nanomechanical mapping of bone tissue regenerated by magnetic scaffolds.

Authors:  Michele Bianchi; Marco Boi; Maria Sartori; Gianluca Giavaresi; Nicola Lopomo; Milena Fini; Alek Dediu; Anna Tampieri; Maurilio Marcacci; Alessandro Russo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Bone-Implant Interface.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Evaluation of the effects of topically applied simvastatin on titanium implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Serkan Dundar; Alihan Bozoglan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-04-17

7.  Gradient nanostructured titanium stimulates cell responses in vitro and enhances osseointegration in vivo.

Authors:  Nan-Jue Cao; Yu-He Zhu; Fei Gao; Chen Liang; Zhen-Bo Wang; Yue Zhang; Chun-Ping Hao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

8.  Early healing events around titanium implant devices with different surface microtopography: a pilot study in an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Ester Orsini; Stefano Salgarello; Désirée Martini; Beatrice Bacchelli; Marilisa Quaranta; Luciano Pisoni; Emma Bellei; Monika Joechler; Vittoria Ottani
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

9.  Can bone apposition predict the retention force of a femoral stem? An experimental weight-bearing hip-implant model in goats.

Authors:  Knut Harboe; Christian Lycke Ellingsen; Einar Sudmann; Nils Roar Gjerdet; Kjetil Søreide; Kari Indrekvam
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size.

Authors:  Vasilena Ivanova; Ivan Chenchev; Stefan Zlatev; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.