Literature DB >> 17468765

Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods.

Konstantinos Mavromatis1, Natalia Ivanova, Kerrie Barry, Harris Shapiro, Eugene Goltsman, Alice C McHardy, Isidore Rigoutsos, Asaf Salamov, Frank Korzeniewski, Miriam Land, Alla Lapidus, Igor Grigoriev, Paul Richardson, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Metagenomics is a rapidly emerging field of research for studying microbial communities. To evaluate methods presently used to process metagenomic sequences, we constructed three simulated data sets of varying complexity by combining sequencing reads randomly selected from 113 isolate genomes. These data sets were designed to model real metagenomes in terms of complexity and phylogenetic composition. We assembled sampled reads using three commonly used genome assemblers (Phrap, Arachne and JAZZ), and predicted genes using two popular gene-finding pipelines (fgenesb and CRITICA/GLIMMER). The phylogenetic origins of the assembled contigs were predicted using one sequence similarity-based (blast hit distribution) and two sequence composition-based (PhyloPythia, oligonucleotide frequencies) binning methods. We explored the effects of the simulated community structure and method combinations on the fidelity of each processing step by comparison to the corresponding isolate genomes. The simulated data sets are available online to facilitate standardized benchmarking of tools for metagenomic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468765     DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  167 in total

1.  Individual genome assembly from complex community short-read metagenomic datasets.

Authors:  Chengwei Luo; Despina Tsementzi; Nikos C Kyrpides; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Practical application of self-organizing maps to interrelate biodiversity and functional data in NGS-based metagenomics.

Authors:  Marc Weber; Hanno Teeling; Sixing Huang; Jost Waldmann; Mariette Kassabgy; Bernhard M Fuchs; Anna Klindworth; Christine Klockow; Antje Wichels; Gunnar Gerdts; Rudolf Amann; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Evaluating the Quantitative Capabilities of Metagenomic Analysis Software.

Authors:  Csaba Kerepesi; Vince Grolmusz
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Functional metagenomics reveals novel salt tolerance loci from the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Eamonn P Culligan; Roy D Sleator; Julian R Marchesi; Colin Hill
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 5.  Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology.

Authors:  Mihai Pop; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges.

Authors:  Mihai Pop
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Comparative metagenomic and rRNA microbial diversity characterization using archaeal and bacterial synthetic communities.

Authors:  Migun Shakya; Christopher Quince; James H Campbell; Zamin K Yang; Christopher W Schadt; Mircea Podar
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  AKE - the Accelerated k-mer Exploration web-tool for rapid taxonomic classification and visualization.

Authors:  Daniel Langenkämper; Alexander Goesmann; Tim Wilhelm Nattkemper
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  k-SLAM: accurate and ultra-fast taxonomic classification and gene identification for large metagenomic data sets.

Authors:  David Ainsworth; Michael J E Sternberg; Come Raczy; Sarah A Butcher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Unravelling ancient microbial history with community proteogenomics and lipid geochemistry.

Authors:  Jochen J Brocks; Jillian Banfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.